GET THE APP

How Does Stress Affect the Immune Response?
Cell & Developmental Biology

Cell & Developmental Biology
Open Access

ISSN: 2168-9296

+44 1478 350008

Editorial - (2012) Volume 1, Issue 1

How Does Stress Affect the Immune Response?

Robert C. Sizemore*
Department of Biological Sciences, Alcorn State University, 1000 ASU Drive, #870, Alcorn State, MS 39096, USA
*Corresponding Author: Robert C. Sizemore, Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Alcorn State University, 1000 ASU Drive #870, Alcorn State, MS 39096, USA Email:

Abstract

It has been well established that the immune and neuroendocrine systems interact and communicate with each other, a relationship that contributes to the regulation of cell-mediated and humoral responses [1-4]. The effect of stress on immune responses has been noted for centuries; observations that psychological stress influences the body’s ability to respond to infection and the recovery from wounds in battle have been recorded throughout history. Recently, short-term stress has been shown to enhance immune responses whereas long-term stress leads to suppression. Although the mechanisms responsible for these observations have still not been fully elucidated data from this laboratory indicate that molecules produced in response to stress may play a major role. More surprisingly, it appears that the active moieties are extremely small peptides cleaved from larger neuroendocrine molecules.

<

It has been well established that the immune and neuroendocrine systems interact and communicate with each other, a relationship that contributes to the regulation of cell-mediated and humoral responses [1-4]. The effect of stress on immune responses has been noted for centuries; observations that psychological stress influences the body’s ability to respond to infection and the recovery from wounds in battle have been recorded throughout history. Recently, short-term stress has been shown to enhance immune responses whereas long-term stress leads to suppression. Although the mechanisms responsible for these observations have still not been fully elucidated data from this laboratory indicate that molecules produced in response to stress may play a major role. More surprisingly, it appears that the active moieties are extremely small peptides cleaved from larger neuroendocrine molecules.

Recently it was recognized that the neuroendocrine system and immune cells produce peptide hormones, which interact through shared ligand receptors [1,5-6]. These bidirectional molecules include endogenous peptide opioids, such as endorphins and enkephalins, which function as natural analgesics [2,7]. A lthough the enkephalins share amino acid homology with the endorphins and dynorphins (i.e. the first five amino acids of β-endorphin are identical to methionineenkephalin; the first five amino acids of dynorphin A are identical to leucine-enkephalin), these molecules are though to be derived from different precursors. Thus, β-endorphin and several other bioactive peptides including adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), lipotropins and melanotropins are derived from pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), a product of the pituitary and the hypothalamus [8,9]. The dynorphins are derived from prodynorphin, also a pituitary hormone [10,11]. The enkephalins (methionine enkephalin, Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Met and leucine-enkephalin, Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Leu), are derived from proenkephalin A and are thought to be synthesized at various locations including the adrenals [2,7,8]. It was also discovered that immune cells could also produce β-endorphin, dynorphins and enkephalins [9,12,13].

Several investigations have shown that endogenous peptide opioids, such as endorphins, dynorphins and enkephalins, are capable of modulating immune activities in vivo and in vitro [1,2,14-19]. Reports describing many of these immunomodulatory effects have been conflicting in that some show only dose-dependent suppression whereas others describe dose-dependent enhancement of the same function [20-23]. In some cases, a biphasic response was observed in the same system, the resultant response dependent on concentration - for example lower concentrations of the enkephalins enhanced while higher concentrations suppressed the activity or function [23-32].

Data from this laboratory has demonstrated that methionineenkephalin (met-enkephalin, Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Met [YGGFM]) and certain of its peptide derivatives (Tyr-Gly-Gly [YGG] and Tyr- Gly [YG]) modulate immune responses in a biphasic manner with suppression at high doses and enhancement at low concentrations. These data showed in vivo (via delayed-type hypersensitivity responses, [33] and in vitro (via cytokine production, [34]) that met-enkephalin, YGG and YG modulated immune responses in a concentrationdependent biphasic manner without affecting the overall number of cells. Met-enkephalin, YGG and YG modulated the production of IFN-γ biphasically. Furthermore, at higher concentrations metenkephalin and YG suppressed the production of IL-2 and IL-4. The di- and tri-peptides showed a higher specific activity than the parent molecule with YG being the smallest active moiety: Tyr alone did not show activity although the terminal Tyr was required on the peptide since GGFM [des-tyr met-enkephalin] was inactive. We initially proposed that met-enkephalin must be cleaved to YG to be active since we had found YG and YGG were more potent than met-enkephalin in immune enhancement. However, we subsequently found that an analog of met-enkephalin resistant to peptidase activity (D-Ala2, D-Met enkephalin [DADME]) enhanced responses in our system but did not induce suppression at any concentration. Thus, while cleavage of YGGFM to YG may be required for induction of immune suppression it is not required for immune enhancement. Naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist) only blocked the enhancing effects of metenkephalin and not the suppressive ones. Thus, it appears that binding to classical opiate receptors is involved in the initiation of enhancement by met-enkephalin while cleavage to YG and an unidentified, nonopioid receptor may be associated with suppression.

This is consistent with negative feedback such that when the concentration of YG rises to sufficient levels, a suppressor mechanism is stimulated to down regulate immune responses. The nature of this suppression is yet to be elucidated. The following model/hypotheses is proposed to account for these observations:

Neuroendocrine cells produce met-enkephalin (either directly or via cleavage of β-endorphin) in response to stress. During immune stimulation lymphoid cells also produce metenkephalin.

• Low concentrations of met-enkephalin enhance the immune response possibly via modulation of an inflammatory type 1 response. This effect appears to be mediated by classical opiate receptors (most likely δ) on T cells.

• Met-enkephalin is cleaved into YGG and YG by proteases present in serum or via membrane-bound ectoenzymes on cells; YGG is further cleaved to YG. At low concentrations, YG continues to stimulate type 1 responses possibly through unidentified, nonopioid receptors.

• As the level of YG rises, a feedback mechanism is initiated that suppresses the immune response (cytokine-mediated/ regulatory cell-mediated?).

• The activity of YG and the other bioactive molecules is then curtailed by cleavage of the terminal Tyr by membrane-bound or secreted aminopeptidases.

Because others have shown that stress stimulates the endogenous synthesis and release of opioid peptides our data could thus provide a mechanism for understanding why immune responses in highly stressed individuals have frequently been found to be lower than in their unstressed counterparts. It also explains why short-term stress is associated with enhanced immunity. Further understanding of how opioid peptides are able to modulate the immune system may provide a basis for monitoring the endogenous immunomodulatory parameters of patients, enhancing immune reactions that are suppressed (such as due to stress) and suppressing those that are deleterious (such as allergic or inflammatory responses). Additionally, these studies may identify a novel immunoregulatory mechanism heretofore unrecognized and given that the enkephalins are conserved throughout nature, it may represent one of the oldest means of regulating immune responses in phylogeny.

References

  1. Smith EM (2003) Opioid peptides in immune cells. In: Immune Mechanisms of Pain and Analgesia, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Editied by Halina M, Christoph S, Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers, New York, 521: 51-68.
  2. Gomez-Flores R, Weber RJ (1999) Opioids, opioid receptors, and the immune system. In: Cytokines, Stress and Immunity”, edited by Nicholas PP, Robert EF, Anthony JM, Robert AG, (2nd edn), CRC Press, Boca Raton 281-314.
  3. Blalock JE (1994) The syntax of immune-neuroendocrine communications. Immunol Today 15: 504-511.
  4. Segerstrom SC, Miller GE (2006) Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychol Bull 130: 601-630.
  5. Gilmore W, Moloney M, Weiner LP (1990) The role of opioid peptides in immunomodulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 597: 252-263.
  6. Blalock JE, Harbour-McMenamin D, Smith EM (1985) Peptide hormones shared by the neuroendocrine and immunologic systems. J Immunol 135: 858s-861s.
  7. Wybran J, Schandené L, Van Vooren JP, Vandermoten G, Latinne D, et al. (1987) Immunologic properties of methionine-enkephalin, and therapeutic implications in ADIS, ARC, and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 496: 108-114.
  8. Salzet M, Salzet-Raveillon B, Cocquerelle C, Verger-Bocquet M, Pryor SC, et al. (1997) Leech immunocytes contain proopiomelanocortin (POMC): nitric oxide mediates hemolymph POMC processing. J Immunol 159: 5400-5411.
  9. Paola S (1999) Interleukins and immunocyte b-endorphin. In: Cytokines, Stress and Immunity, Edited by Nicholas PP, Robert EF, Anthony JM, Robert AG. CRC Press, Boca Raton 271-280.
  10. Goldstein A, Tachibana S, Lowney LI, Hunkapiller M, Hood L (1979) Dynorphin-(1-13), an extrordinary potent opioid peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76: 6666-6670.
  11. Goldstein A, Fischli W, Lowney LI, Hunkapiller M, Hood L (1981) Porcine pituitary dynorphin: complete amino acid sequence of the biologically active heptadecapeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78: 7219-7223.
  12. Linner KM, Quist HE, Sharp BM (1995) Met-enkephalin-containing peptides encoded by proenkephalin A mRNA expressed in activated murine thymocytes inhibit thymocyte proliferation. J Immunol 154: 5049-5060.
  13. Cabot PJ, Carter L, Schäfer M, Stein C (2001) Methionine-enkephalin- and dynorphin A-release from immune cells and control of inflammatory pain. Pain 93: 207-212.
  14. Plotnikoff NP, Faith RE, Murgo AJ, Herberman RB, Good RA (1997) Methionine enkephalin: a new cytokine- human studies. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 82: 93-101.
  15. Fischer EG (1988) Opioid peptides modulate immune functions. A review. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 10: 265-326.
  16. Li XY (1988) Immunomodulating effects of methionine enkephalin. Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao 19: 3-6.
  17. Bhargava HN (1990) Opioid peptides, receptors, and immune function. NIDA Res Monogr 96: 220-233.
  18. Gabrilovac J, Balog T, Andreis A (2003) Dynorphin-A(1-17) decreases nitric oxide release and ctyotoxicity incuced with lipopolysaccharide plus interferon-gamma in murine macrophage cell line J774. Biomed Pharmacother 57: 351-358.
  19. Liu XH, Huang DA, Yang FY, Hao YS, Du GG, et al. (2003) A new cytokine: the possible effect pathway of methionine enkephalin. World J Gastroenterol 9: 169-173.
  20. Wybran J (1985) Enkephalins and endorphins as modifiers of the immune system: present and future. Fed Proc 44: 92-94.
  21. Hsueh CM, Hiramoto RN, Ghanta VK (1992) The central effect of methionine-enkephalin on NK cell activity. Brain Res 578: 142-148.
  22. Kastin AJ, Seligson J, Strimas JH, Chi DS (1991) Failure of met-enkephalin to enhance natural killer cell activity. Immunobiology 183: 55-68.
  23. Oleson DR, Johnson DR (1988) Regulation of human natural cytotoxicity by enkephalins and selective opiate agonists. Brain Behav Immun 2: 171-186.
  24. Gabriella F, Medgyesi GA, Szekely JI (1986) Significant role of receptor coupling in the neuropeptide-induced alterations of macrophage cytotoxicity. In: “Enkephalins and Endorphins: Stress and the Immune System”, edited by Nicholas PP, Robert EF, Anthony JM, Robert AG. Plenum Press, New York 303-320.
  25. Dubinin KV, Zakharova LA, Khegai LA, Zaitsev SV (1994) Immunomodulating effect of met-enkephalin on different stages of lymphocyte proliferation induced with concanavalin A in vitro. Immunopharm Immunotoxicol 16: 463-472.
  26. Singh S, Singh PP, Dhawan VC, Haq W, Mathur KB, et al. (1994) Lymphokine production by concanavalin A-stimulated mouse splenocytes: modulation by met-enkephalin and a related peptide. Immunopharmacology 27: 245- 251.
  27. Munn NA, Lum LG (1989) Immunoregulatory effects of a-endorphin, b-endorphin, methionine enkephalin, and adrenocorticotropic hormone on anti-tetanus toxoid antibody synthesis by human lymphocytes. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 52: 376-385.
  28. Singh PP, Singh S, Dhawan VC, Haq W, Mathur KB, et al. (1991) Enkephalins modulation of Plasmodium cynomolgi antigens-induced colony-stimulating factors elaboration by macrophages. J Biol Regul Homeost agents 5: 142-146.
  29. Sizemore RC, Dienglewicz RL, Pecunia E, Gottlieb AA (1991) Modulation of concanavalin A-induced, antigen-nonspecific regulatory cell activity by leu- enkephalin and related peptides. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 60: 310-318.
  30. Jankovic BD (1991) Enkephalins and immune inflammatory reactions. Acta Neurol (Napoli) 13: 453-441.
  31. Veljic J, Ranin J, Maric D, Jankovic BD (1991) Modulation of cutaneous immune reactions by centrally applied methionine-enkephalin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 650: 51-55.
  32. Jankovic BD, Maric D (1987) Enkephalins and autoimmunity: differential effect of methionine-enkephalin on experimental allergic encephalomyelitits in Wistar and Lewis rats. J Neurosci Res 18: 88-94.
  33. Sizemore RC, Piva M, Moore L, Gordonov N, Heilman E, et al. (2004) Modulation of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in hairless guinea pigs by peptides derived from enkephalin. Neuroimmunomodulation 11: 141-148.
  34. Piva M, Moreno JI, Jenkins FS, Smith JK, Thomas JL, et al. (2005) In vitromoduation of cytokine expression by enkephalin-derived peptides. Neuroimmunomodulation 12: 339-347.
Citation: Sizemore RC (2012) How Does Stress Affect the Immune Response? Cell Development Biol 1:e101.

Copyright: © 2012 Sizemore RC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top