GET THE APP

Internal Medicine: Open Access

Internal Medicine: Open Access
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-8048

Commentary - (2022)Volume 12, Issue 10

Formulating Metrics that Accurately Reflect the True Value of Primary Care

Paul Yageria*
 
*Correspondence: Paul Yageria, Department of Medicine, Osaka University, New York, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

Primary Care (PC) is a critical component of any high-quality healthcare system, and it benefits disadvantaged people in particular. It helps health systems operate better overall, and nations that refocus their health systems to PC are better poised to attain universal health coverage. Individuals, populations, and health systems all benefit from personal computers, according to decades of research.

PC contributes to the health of all members of society and increases fairness in access and outcomes as a crucial component of any high-quality healthcare system. PC has a particularly positive impact on vulnerable patients, such as those with multiple health problems, people from socially deprived backgrounds, and those with poorly defined illnesses or limited health literacy, as it is capable of meeting 80-90 percent of an individual's healthcare needs over their lifetime. A healthy PC workforce is linked to a decreased death rate. The necessity of investing in PC will become even more as the population ages and multimorbidity becomes the norm.

PC helps health systems enhance their entire performance by enhancing equality, patient-centeredness, access, continuity, coordination, comprehensiveness, quality, and efficiency of treatment. PC is a vital link between personal and population health, and for most individuals, it has been the primary source of treatment for the past 50 years. Even if health systems with more advanced PC are slightly more expensive.

It is critical to evaluate PC performance in health systems in order to create PC-friendly health policies. And here's the rub: health-care success is mostly measured using disease-specific measures such as mortality, life expectancy, and management. PC, on the other hand, is in charge of dealing with the vast majority of health issues that aren't always reflected in a precise diagnostic and/or leading to preventative and self-management choices. This leads to a bias toward secondary care, which is focused on particular diagnoses that are too narrowly defined to account for overall care quality in complicated populations with multimorbidity and limited access to treatment.

Consequences of primary care and primary health care

While the terms PHC and PC are sometimes interchanged, the World Health Organization (WHO) defines PHC as a health policy and service delivery model that encompasses both individual-based care and population-level public health and policy. Health promotion, illness prevention, public health, and rehabilitation services are all part of population health. PHC also includes a wide range of multi-sectorial services, such as community-based social services.

In the quest of health care and health, PC entails first contact with patients and their families. Individual care encompasses a person's overall health and well-being, as well as the health and well-being of their family, at all ages and phases of life. Family medicine is the medical specialty that serves as the primary point of contact and, in many cases, the leader of a contemporary PC team. Patients' varied medical conditions can be addressed by family doctors, who can also integrate treatment for individuals and families throughout the entire spectrum of PHC. However, depending on the environment and culture, the effectiveness of modern family physicians is dependent on a variety of other health professionals in the PC team, including as nurses, midwives, pharmacists, mental health workers, and others. PC teams with effective communication channels between professionals and tight collaboration with them have a higher success rate. The Lancet Global Health Commission on High Quality Health Systems recommends that the core metrics of health system performance be competent and respectful care, better health, and health system trust, and that other health system components like finance, management, or organization are a function of high quality, equitable, and efficient care.

Author Info

Paul Yageria*
 
Department of Medicine, Osaka University, New York, USA
 

Citation: Yageria P (2022) Formulating Metrics that Accurately Reflect the True Value of Primary Care Intern Med. 12: 918

Received: 02-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. IME-22-48444; Editor assigned: 04-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. IME-22-48444 (PQ); Reviewed: 19-Apr-2022, QC No. IME-22-48444; Revised: 24-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. IME-22-48444 (R); Published: 03-May-2022 , DOI: 10.35248/2165-8048.22.12.918

Copyright: © 2022 Yageria P. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top