ISSN: 2167-0250
Research Article - (2025)Volume 14, Issue 5
Background: Erectile dysfunction among diabetic patients ranges from 20%-90% and is the most neglected problem. It can affect all aspects of client life, including physical, emotional, social, sexual and relationships. Little has been studied in developing countries like Ethiopia; therefore, this study assesses the proportion of erectile dysfunction and associated factors among men with diabetes mellitus in north east Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals.
Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study design was used from July to August 2023. A total of 361 participants were selected using the systematic random sampling method. The data were collected using pretested intervieweradministered questionnaires. The study tool for the outcome variable was checked for reliability using the Cronbach alpha test (0.7). The data were entered into Epi data version 4.2 and exported to Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23 for further analysis. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify the association between dependent and independent variables. Finally, a p-value less than 0.05 was used as statistically significant.
Result: The proportion of erectile dysfunction among men with diabetes mellitus was 59% (95% CI 53.4%-64.4%). Being in the age group of 31-44 (AOR 4.46, 95% CI: 1.06-18.81); 45-59 (AOR 18.2, 95% CI: 2.9-34.5) and ≥ 60 years (AOR 19.7, 95% CI: 2.3-36.8). The presence of diabetic complications (AOR 5.5, 95% CI: 1.61-1.8.58) and the presence of co-morbidities (AOR 3.8, 95% CI: 1.3-1.0.6) were factors associated with erectile dysfunction. In addition, regular exercise (AOR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.07-0.33) and good glycemic control (AOR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.158-0.886) are inversely associated with erectile dysfunction.
Conclusion: The proportion of erectile dysfunction was high. So, there is a need for health care providers to incorporate screening for sexual dysfunction, like other complications of diabetes. This helps to prevent its early occurrence by reducing the occurrence of diabetic complications, treating co-morbidities, promoting good glycemic control and providing health information about engaging in regular exercise.
Erectile dysfunction; Diabetes mellitus; Glycemic control
AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; COR: Crude Odds Ratio; DCSH: Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; ETB: Ethiopian Birr; IIEF-5: International Index Erectile Function; NIH: National Institute of Health; OPD: Out Patient Department; SD: Standard Deviation; SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Science; USA: United State of America; WCSH: Woldia Comprehensive Specialized Hospital; WHO: World Health Organization
Medical treatment of erectile dysfunction and the National Institution of Health (NIH) consent conference panel define erectile dysfunction as the inability to attain or maintain penile erection to perform satisfactory sexual intercourse. It is a major problem in the world with a variety of severity and medical conditions like cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic abnormalities, which are increasing from time to time due to sedentary lifestyles and changes in feeding styles from organic food to processed and trans food. The process of achieving penile erection involves complex processes. Result from the integration of psychological, neurological and vascular processes, which combine to initiate a physiologic response within the penile vasculature. The pathogenesis of erectile dysfunction results from vasculopathy, neuropathy, visceral adiposity, insulin resistance and hypogonadism. Diabetic vasculopathy concerns macroangiopathy, microangiopathy and endothelial dysfunction. Macrovascular disease in diabetes corresponds to atherosclerotic damage in the blood vessels, which limits blood flow to the penis [1].
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that around 422 million adults lived with diabetes in 2014; diabetes increased the risk of erectile dysfunction threefold. A review of 145 studies states that the prevalence of erectile dysfunction among all types of diabetic patients was 52.5. The odds of having erectile dysfunction are three times higher as compared to the same age group of non-diabetic men. The magnitude of erectile dysfunction in all age groups without considering special medical causes is around 10%; this figure increases with age; the magnitude for age 50-80 was 35%-60% and the presence of other comorbidities increases its risk. Erectile dysfunction diabetic patients were 2-4 times and 10-15 years early within the same age as compared to non-diabetic patients.
Different studies showed that in the in the USA, Boston, Japan and Turkey, the proportion of erectile dysfunction was 48.5%, 90% and 72%, respectively. Studies from Africa content: In Nigeria, Egypt and Tanzania, the proportion of erectile dysfunction was 58%, 42.9% and 55.5%, respectively. Factors associated with erectile dysfunction among diabetes patients were older age, increased duration of diabetes, poor glycemic control, alcohol drinking, smoking cigarettes, the presence of comorbidity, overweight, hypertension, other cardiovascular diseases and the presence of diabetes complications like diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy [2].
Though different guidelines and implementation manuals recommended that all adults with diabetes should be screened for erectile dysfunction using sexual function history, there is still a gap in implementing a screening program; only 10% of patients discussed their problem with their physician. Moreover, erectile dysfunction was an independent predictor of poor glycemic control, other co-morbidities like hypertension, cardiovascular abnormalities and late complications of diabetes like nephropathy, neuropathy and macro- and microvascular problems. Erectile dysfunction affects the quality of life; males feel depressed and loss of self-confidence may end with divorce. For female partners, the magnitude of reduced sexual interest is relatively higher for those who live with impotent men than non-impotent men (60%, 29% respectively).
Though the problem is very high in developing countries like Ethiopia, little has been known about the issue. Many men with diabetes develop erectile dysfunction at a young age or in middle adulthood in the study area, but due to cultural and social barriers, the problem is not discussed with health care professionals. Therefore, this study aims to assess the proportion of erectile dysfunction and factors associated with men with diabetes mellitus in Ethiopia [3].
Study area and period
This study was conducted at north east Amaha region compressive specialized hospitals from July to August 2023. There are two compressive specialized hospitals, which are Dessie Compressive Specialized Hospital (DCSH) and Woldia Compressive Specialized Hospital (WCSH). DCSH is located in the northeast part of Ethiopia in the South Wollo administrative zone of the Amara region, located 401 km away from the capital city, Addis Ababa and 425 km from Amara regional stat city, Bahir Dar. According to the central statistics agency report, Dessie has an estimated total population of 151,094 and DCSH has 300 beds providing health services to the people of Dessie and the adjacent regions. Diabetic care and follow-up is one of the many services delivered by the unit. A total of 1000 clients with diabetes are on follow-up at DCSH. WCSH is located 521 km from the capital city of the country and 388 km from Bahir Dar, the capital city of the Amhara region. The hospital serves 3.5 million people in the north Wollo zone and its neighbors’ regions. The hospital has 240 beds and provides chronic care and follow-up services. Currently, the total number of adult patients attending the service is 800.
Study design
An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted using the quantitative data collection method.
Source population
All men with diabetes mellitus who were on follow-up at north east Amhara compressive specialized hospitals.
Study population
All men with diabetes mellitus who were on follow-up at north east Amhara compressive specialized hospitals during the study period.
Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All men with diabetes mellitus who were on follow-up at north east Amhara compressive specialized hospitals aged above 18 years old and married or in a sexual relationship were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Diabetic men who had a history of pelvic surgery, a history of pelvic and spinal cord trauma and were unable to communicate due to severe pain were excluded from the study.
Sample size determination
The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion from a study conducted in central and northern Tigray with a proportion of erectile dysfunction of 69.9%. After considering the 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 361.
Sampling technique and sampling procedure
The list of all diabetic patients at Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital and Woldia comprehensive specialized hospital was recorded. A proportional allocation was made based on the case load. Then, from the given lists, 361 study participants were selected by using a simple random sampling technique (Figure 1) [4].
Figure 1: Schematic presentation of sampling procedure to select study participants on erectile dysfunction and associated factors among diabetic men in North Amahara comprhesive specialized hospitals 2023.
Variables
Dependent variable: Erectile dysfunction.
Independent variables: Socio-demographic and economic factors include age, educational level and economic level. Personal and behavioral factors include smoking cigarettes, chat chewing, drinking alcohol, physical exercise and fruit and vegetable consumption. Diabetic-related factors include type of DM, duration of DM and the presence of other complications like neuropathy, nephropathy and retinopathy. Co-morbid conditions include obesity, overweight, hypertension and cardiovascular disease [5].
Operational definition
Erectile dysfunction: International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score less than 22. Severe (1-7), moderate (8-12), mildmoderate (12-16), mild (17-21) and no erectile dysfunction (22-25).
Good glycemic control: HbAlC<7 mg/dl
Poor glycemic control: HbAlC>7 mg/dl
Low monthly income: <1500 ETB
Medill income: 1500-2500 ETB
High income: >2500 ETB
Hypertension: BP>140/90 mmhg
Overweight: BMI of 25-30 kg/m2.
Obesity: BMI of >30 kg/m2
High physical activity: A person reaching any of the following criteria: Vigorous intensity activity for at least 3 days per week, achieving a minimum of at least 1,500 minutes per week; or 7 or more days of any combination of walking and moderate vigorous intensity activities per week, achieving a minimum of at least 3,000 minutes per week.
Moderate physical activity category: Three or more days per week of vigorous intensity activity for at least 20 minutes per day, 5 or more days per week of moderate-intensity activity or walking for at least 30 minutes per day or 5 or more days per week of any combination of walking and moderate or vigorous intensity activities, achieving a minimum of at least 600 METminutes per week [6].
Low physical activity: Those who had low levels of physical activity; moderate and high levels of physical activity were collapsed in further analysis.
Alcohol users: Participants who have ever consumed a drink that contains alcohol (such as beer, wine, fermented cider like tella, tej, areqi, etc.) during their lifetime.
Heavy drinkers: Participants who consume seven drinks per week that contain alcohol.
A smoker is someone who, at the time of the survey, smokes any tobacco product either daily or occasionally. Smokers may be further divided into two categories.
A daily smoker is someone who smokes any tobacco product at least once a day (with the exception that people who smoke every day but not on days of religious fasting are still classified as daily smokers).
Non-smoker: Someone who, at the time of the survey, does not smoke at all.
Ex-smokers are people who were formerly daily smokers but currently do not smoke at all.
Never-smokers are those who either have never smoked at all or have never been daily smokers and have smoked less than 100 cigarettes (or the equivalent amount of tobacco) in their lifetime.
Data collection method and tool
The data was collected using an interview-administered questionnaire for primary data from clients and a chart review for the presence of other co-morbidities and recent laboratory results. The questionnaire was comprised of socio-demographic characteristics, DM-related, co-morbidity and complication questions and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) which contains five questions that account for 0-5 and are totally scored from 25. The questionnaires were developed from different texts. Three data collectors and one supervisor who is a health professional were recruited [7].
Data quality control
To ensure the quality of the data, training was given to data collectors and supervisors. Questionnaires were pre-tested on 5% of the sample size before the actual data collection. Strict supervision was provided by the principal investigator and supervisors. The collected data were checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency by the principal investigator every day. Anything that was unclear was corrected and communicated to the data collectors the next day. The interview-administered questionnaire was prepared in English by adopting the pertinent variables and terminologies from various studies. Then it was translated into the local language of the study area, Amharic. Finally, it was translated back to English by another expert in order to ensure its consistency in meaning.
Data processing and analysis
The data was entered into Epi data 4.2 and analyzed using SPSS version 23 after cleaning and assumption checking were performed. Descriptive statistical analysis was done to describe the characteristics of the study participants. Cross-tabulation was used to assess the adequacy of each cell. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to identify the association between independent variables and erectile dysfunction. Both crude and adjusted odds ratios were computed with their 95% confidence intervals and independent variables that showed association with the dependent variable at a p-value less than 0.2 were included in the initial multivariable logistic regression. A P-value less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance in this study [8].
Socio-economic and demographic factors
From a total of 361 participants, 354 were involved, which gives a response rate of 98%. The mean ages of respondents were 46.8 ± 12.8 SD and 81% were below the age of 60. One hundred eighty-four (52.4%) of the respondents were Muslims, followed by 133 (37.5%) Orthodox and 130 (36.7%) of the respondents had college and above as their level of education (Table 1).
|
Variable |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
|
Age |
18-30 |
43 |
12.1 |
|
31-44 |
109 |
30.8 |
|
|
45-59 |
138 |
39 |
|
|
≥ 60 |
64 |
18.1 |
|
|
Religion |
Orthodox christianity |
133 |
37.6 |
|
Muslim |
184 |
52 |
|
|
Protestant |
27 |
7.6 |
|
|
Catholic |
10 |
2.8 |
|
|
Residency |
Urban |
150 |
42.37 |
|
Rural |
204 |
57.63 |
|
|
Educational label |
No formal education |
58 |
16.4 |
|
Primary school |
71 |
20.1 |
|
|
Secondary school |
95 |
26.8 |
|
|
College and above |
130 |
36.7 |
|
|
Occupation |
Farmer |
61 |
12.7 |
|
Government employee |
90 |
25.4 |
|
|
NGO employee |
34 |
9.6 |
|
|
Merchant |
88 |
24.9 |
|
|
Daily labour |
49 |
13.8 |
|
|
Others |
32 |
9 |
|
|
Monthly income |
<850 ETB |
38 |
10.7 |
|
850-1680 ETB |
97 |
27.4 |
|
|
>1680 ETB |
219 |
61.9 |
|
|
Note: Others: Privet employee, broker, beggary and jobless |
|||
Table 1: Socio-demographic variables among diabetic men attending North East Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, 2023.
Personal and behavioural factors of the respondents
Seventy-two (20.3%) and 33 (9.3%) of the respondents currently drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes, respectively. Two hundred eighteen (61.6%) of the study participants didn’t engage in regular exercise (Table 2).
| Variable | Frequency | Percentage | |
| History of drinking alcohol | Never drink alcohol | 197 | 55.60% |
| Ex-drink alcohol | 85 | 24.10% | |
| Currently drink alcohol | 72 | 20.30% | |
| History of smoking cigarette | Never smoker | 273 | 77.10% |
| Ex-smoker | 48 | 13.60% | |
| Current smoker | 33 | 9.30% | |
| Sticks smoked per day | <10 sticks smokes/day | 67 | 82.70% |
| >10 sticks smokes/day | 14 | 17.30% | |
| History of chat chewing | Never chewer | 223 | 63% |
| Sometimes chewer | 49 | 13.80% | |
| Daily chewer | 42 | 11.90% | |
| Ex-chewer | 40 | 11.30% | |
| Engaged in regular exercise | Yes | 136 | 38.40% |
| No | 218 | 61.60% | |
Table 2: Personal and behavioural factors erectile dysfunction among diabetic men attending North East Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, 2023.
Clinical history of the respondent
Two hundred forty-three (68%) of the study subjects had type 2 diabetes mellitus and the mean duration of diagnosis was 9.35 ± 5.8, ranging from 1-34 years. The mean glucose level was 178 ± 81 mg/dl, ranging from 75 to 300 mg/dl. One hundred twenty six (36%) and ninety-seven (27%) of the diabetes men in this study live with co-morbid disease and have developed diabetes complications, respectively (Table 3) [9].
|
Variable |
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
|
Type of DM |
Type 1 |
111 |
31.40% |
|
Type 2 |
243 |
68.60% |
|
|
Duration of Dx |
<6 |
113 |
32.00% |
|
6-10 |
101 |
28.h50% |
|
|
>10 |
140 |
39.50% |
|
|
Rx for DM |
Injection |
131 |
37% |
|
Oral |
223 |
63% |
|
|
Label of glucose/FBS |
Good |
220 |
62.10% |
|
Poor |
134 |
37.90% |
|
|
Co-morbidity |
Yes |
129 |
36.40% |
|
No |
225 |
63.60% |
|
|
Types of co morbidity |
Hypertension |
59 |
16.70% |
|
Cardiovascular disease |
33 |
9.30% |
|
|
Over weight |
27 |
7.60% |
|
|
Obesity |
10 |
2.80% |
|
|
Complication |
Yes |
97 |
27.40% |
|
No |
257 |
72.60% |
|
|
Types of complication |
Nephropathy |
11 |
3.00% |
|
Neuropathy |
37 |
10.40% |
|
|
Retinopathy |
21 |
5.90% |
|
|
Foot ulcer |
20 |
5.60% |
|
|
Others |
9 |
2.50% |
|
Table 3: Clinical history of diabetic men attending North East Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, 2023.
Treatment seeking behaviour of the respondent
Only 17 (4.8%) of the respondents talked about sexual issues with their physician ever and 14 (4%) received treatment for erectile dysfunction, but more than 76.6% of the subjects, with or without the problem, expressed interest in discussing the issue with their career.
Proportion of erectile dysfunction
The mean IIEF-5 score was 19 ± 5.1 SD and ranged from 3 up to 25. Out of a total of 59% (95% CI 54.7%-73.7%) of the respondents developed any form of erectile dysfunction over the last 6 months. The proportions of severe, moderate, mild to moderate and mild ED were 6.2% (3.7% 8%), 5.1% (2.8% 7.3%), 12.4% (9.3% 15.8%) and 35.3% (30.2% 40.1%), respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Proportion of erectile dysfunction among diabetic men attending North East Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, 2023.
Factors associated to erectile dysfunction
In bi-variable logistic regression analysis, older age, chat chewing, drinking alcohol, presence of diabetes complications and comorbid disease, duration of diabetes, types of diabetes smoking cigarettes, engaging in regular exercise, poor glycemic control, income label <850 ETB, conception of fruit and vegetables were candidates for multivariable logistic regression analysis (p ≤ 0.2).
Multivariable logistic regression analysis found that older age, the presence of co-morbidity and developing any diabetes complications were positive predictors of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. In addition, good glycemic control and engaging in regular exercise were negative predicators of erectile dysfunction at p-value ≤ 0.05 (Table 4) [10].
|
Variable |
Erectile dysfunction |
COR (95% CI) |
AOR (95% CI) |
||
|
Yes |
No |
||||
|
Age |
18-30 |
5 |
38 |
1 |
1 |
|
31-44 |
55 |
54 |
7.741 (2.8, 21) |
4.46 (1.059, 19.8)** |
|
|
45-59 |
95 |
43 |
16.79 (6, 45.6) |
18.17 (2.901, 34.10)** |
|
|
âÂÂÂ¥ 60 |
54 |
10 |
41 (12.9, 129) |
19.67 (2.325, 36.81)** |
|
|
History of drinking alcohol |
Never drink |
101 |
96 |
0.63 (0.36, 1.097) |
1.27 (0.494, 3.285) |
|
Ex drinker |
63 |
22 |
1.718 (0.87, 3.37) |
1.52 (0.469, 4.983) |
|
|
Current drinker |
45 |
27 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
History of smoking cigarette |
Never smoke |
141 |
132 |
0.288 (0.12, 0.68) |
|
|
Ex-smoker |
42 |
6 |
1.88 (0.57, 6.2) |
|
|
|
Current smoker |
26 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
|
History of chat chewing |
Never |
115 |
108 |
0.26 (0.117, 0.603) |
|
|
Sometimes |
26 |
23 |
0.28 (0.109, 0.73) |
|
|
|
Daily chew |
36 |
6 |
1.5 (0.47, 4.78) |
|
|
|
Ex-chewer |
32 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
Regular exercise |
Yes |
38 |
98 |
0.107 (0.06, 0.17) |
0.151 (0.07, 0.327)** |
|
No |
171 |
47 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Blood pressure |
Normal |
129 |
132 |
0.159 (0.084, 0.29) |
|
|
Hypertension |
80 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
|
Type of DM |
Type 1 |
36 |
75 |
0.19 (0.12, 0.315) |
|
|
Type 2 |
173 |
70 |
1 |
|
|
|
Complication |
Yes |
92 |
5 |
22 (8.6, 55.9) |
5.49 (1.625, 18.584)** |
|
No |
117 |
140 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Treatment for DM |
Injection |
53 |
78 |
0.29 (0.186, 0.458) |
|
|
Oral |
156 |
67 |
1 |
|
|
|
Co-morbidity |
Yes |
116 |
13 |
12.6 (6.7, 23.8) |
3.76 (1.331, 10.632)** |
|
No |
93 |
132 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Nocturia |
Yes |
1 |
18 |
2.9 (1.6, 5.17) |
|
|
No |
148 |
127 |
1 |
|
|
|
Duration of diagnosis in year |
<5 |
31 |
82 |
1 |
|
|
5-10 |
62 |
39 |
4.2 (2.36, 7.47) |
|
|
|
>10 |
116 |
24 |
12.7 (6.99, 23.37) |
|
|
|
FBS |
>126 |
102 |
118 |
0.218 (0.13, 0.359) |
0.36 (0.158, 0.807)** |
|
<126 |
107 |
27 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
BMI category |
Normal |
147 |
132 |
0.49 (0.149, 1.64) |
|
|
Overweight |
52 |
10 |
2.83 (0.703, 11.4) |
|
|
|
Underweight |
4 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
Income level |
<850 ETB |
29 |
8 |
2.83 (0.77, 0.33) |
|
|
850-1680 ETB |
51 |
45 |
1.41 (0.63, 3.16) |
|
|
|
>1680 ETB |
125 |
91 |
1 |
|
|
Table 4: Logistic regression analysis of erectile dysfunction among diabetic men attending North East Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals, 2023.
In this study, the overall proportion of erectile dysfunction among diabetic patients was 59% (95% CI 54.3%-63.4%). This study was much lower than the findings of the studies done in Tigray (69%) and Bahir Dar (85.5%). The possible justification for this discrepancy might be due to differences in personal and behavioural factors of the respondent, different inclusion and exclusion criteria; we exclude those who were not living with spouses or not in sexual relationships) and also because IIEF-5 was measured through a self-reported scale, there may be variation. But the proportion of severe erectile dysfunction was consistent with the findings of the study in northern Tigray, which was 5.2%. In addition, the findings of this study were in line with the findings of the studies done in Tanzania, which was 55%, Nigeria, which was 56.4% and northern sir, which was 62.9%. This may be due to the similar age category of the study subject. The current study is lower than the findings of studies from Asian countries like Japan (9%) and China (Hong Kong) (63.6%). The possible reason might be socio-economic and cultural differences between the study population. Conversely, the findings of the current study were higher than the findings of studies done in Italy (35.8%) and the USA (49%), which might be attributed to ethnic differences. In addition, Italy and the USA are high-income countries where technological advancement and other wealth-related factors may decrease the proportion of erectile dysfunction as compared to Ethiopia, which is a low-income country.
The study indicated that the age of the participant was found to be a significant associated factor, in which the probability of developing erectile dysfunction is higher among older men. As the age of the participant increases, the probability of developing erectile dysfunction will increase. Being in the age category of 31-44 was four times more likely to develop erectile dysfunction when compared to being in the age category of 18-30. Similarly, the probability of getting erectile dysfunction in the age range of 45-59 was 18 times higher in the age range of 18-30. In addition, the odds of developing erectile dysfunction among people aged ≥ 60 were 19 times higher when compared to the age category of 18-30. This finding is supported by studies done in Bahir Dar, Tigray, Tanzania, Darussalam, Jordan, Egypt, Nigeria, China and the USA. This may be due to the fact that as age increases, the blood vessels shrink and their elasticity decreases, which leads to poor filling of the penile cavernous during erection.
Additionally, as age increases, the occurrence of cardiovascular and other diseases will increase, which will influence penile erection. In the presence of diabetic complications, the probability of getting erectile dysfunction in diabetic men was five times higher than in the absence of diabetic complications. The findings of the studies were in agreement with this study, for instance: Studies done in Jordan, China and Japan. This factor may be attributed to endothelial cell dysfunction. In the presence of co-morbidity, the likelihood of developing diabetes and erectile dysfunction was almost four times higher than if there were no co-morbidity. This is supported by a study done in Jordan. The possible justification for this might be that the presence of co-morbidity increases the stress on the client, which has a negative effect on the client's erectile function.
However, engaging in regular exercise reduces the probability of developing erectile dysfunction by 85%. AOR=0.15 (0.077-0.327). The possible justification for this might be that doing physical exercise may strengthen pelvic muscles and the heart and penile blood vessels may become more resistant, which is very important during erection. Good glycemic control also reduces erectile dysfunction by 64% when compared to poor glycemic control, AOR 0.36 (0.158-0.807). Some of the studies in agreement with the current study were done in Italy and Iran.
As the findings of this study revealed, the proportion of erectile dysfunction was high in the study area. Being older, the presence of diabetes complications and co-morbid disease were positive predictors of erectile dysfunction among men with diabetes. Whereas engaging in physical exercise and good glycemic control reduced the occurrence of erectile dysfunction. Therefore, screening for erectile dysfunction should be part of the follow-up care service, especially for those who are in the in the advanced age group, have diabetic complications and live with other co-morbid. Furthermore, health care providers should incorporate screening for sexual dysfunction, like other complications of diabetes.
This study may be considered the first to assess erectile dysfunction and associated factors among diabetic men at north east Ethiopia, Multiple logistic regression was used to control the possible confounding factors to assess the relative effect of independent variables. We have used IIED-5 score to asses’ erectile dysfunction some respondents may hidden their problem because in our culture it was related to male hood/ masculinity.
Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of Woldia university. For any of the eligible study participants, the purpose, benefits, confidential nature, discomforts and right to withdraw or stop filling out the questionnaire were described and discussed. For the confidentiality and privacy of participants, their name and identification number were not recorded on the questionnaire and data collection procedures were done in diabetic OPD by covering a privacy screen. Informed verbal consent was obtained. The questionnaires were kept in locked cupboards accessible only to principal investigators.
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Woldia University. An official letter was written to DCSH and WCSH. Permission was obtained from the administrative staff of the hospital. Verbal informed consent was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the data were collected after taking informed oral consent from study participants. The study participants were also informed of the attainment of confidentiality and anonymity or any identifiers.
Not applicable.
The datasets used for analysis are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Not applicable.
AG wrote the main manuscript text, wrote the methodology and the discussion section, prepared tables and figures. AG contributed to data analysis, drafting or revising the article, have agreed on the journal to which the article will be submitted, gave final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
We are grateful to thank the study participants and hospital administrators for their willing full participation in the timely fashion.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Citation: Getie A (2025) Erectile Dysfunction and Associated Factors among Diabetes Mellitus Men at North East Amhara Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals. Andrology. 14:359.
Received: 19-May-2024, Manuscript No. ANO-24-31557; Editor assigned: 23-May-2024, Pre QC No. ANO-24-31557 (PQ); Reviewed: 06-Jun-2024, QC No. ANO-24-31557; Revised: 04-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. ANO-24-31557 (R); Published: 11-Aug-2025 , DOI: 10.35248/2167-0250.25.14.359
Copyright: © 2025 Getie A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.