Digital Modeling of Bar (Char) Incidence and Assessment of Braidi
Journal of Geology & Geophysics

Journal of Geology & Geophysics
Open Access

ISSN: 2381-8719

+44 7868 792050

Research Article - (2018) Volume 7, Issue 2

Digital Modeling of Bar (Char) Incidence and Assessment of Braiding Intensity of the Padma River in Bangladesh

Muhammad Muzibur Rahman1* and Nazrul Islam M2
1Department of Geography and Environment, National University, Gazipur, Bangladesh
2Department of Geography and Environment, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
*Corresponding Author: Muhammad Muzibur Rahman, Department of Geography and Environment, National University, Gazipur, Bangladesh, Tel: +880 2-7791040 Email:


Bars are distinctive features of the braided rivers, and have long been the subject of research in fluvial geomorphology, with analysis of data from both flume studies and field observation [1,2]. The bar (Char) is the deposited (sand, silt, gravel) islands on the riverbed that enforce the river to flow in different channels forming braided river plan form (Figure 1). It is recognized that the formation of bars that divide channels and divert flow is responsible for the initiation and maintenance of the braided pattern [2,3-11]. The common prerequisites for the initiation, growth and development of braid bars are high-energy fluvial environments with steep valley gradients, large and variable discharges, high bedload transport, and non-cohesive bank materials [1-3,5,6,12]. The Padma has the cycle process from meandering to braid and/or straight, and therefore, it is important to locate the bars (chars) on the riverbed to know the morphodynamic nature of the river. The processes of bar formation and their impact on channel dynamics are inferred from comparatively few studies [2,3,12-16]. The nature of bar dynamics is critical to understanding channel stability as bank erosion and growth and multiplication of braid bars are interrelated, and thus, it has important implications for the explanation of the process-response linkage between bank erosion and braid bar formation [2,10].


Figure 1: The study reach of the Padma river in Bangladesh.

The plan form properties of braided rivers have received considerable attention, especially of their braiding intensity [2,20,17-27]. Usage of a suitable braiding parameter is an important measure towards better interpretation of braided rivers [20] as the intensity of braiding varies greatly from river to river [25], and even from reach to reach along the course of a particular river under different flow stages [2,27,28]. Yeasmin and Islam [27] have merely quantified the sinuosity ratio and braiding index of the Ganges-Padma River (the up stretch). This study has integrated the char incidence map and braiding intensity of the down stretch i.e., the Padma is referred to as the river stretch (located 22038/ _ 23044/ north latitudes and 89050/ _ 91000/east longitudes) from Aricha to the confluence with the upper Meghna River at Chandpur in Bangladesh (Figure 1). The length of the study reach is about 100 km and is a very large sand-bed river. The bankfull discharge varies from 75,000 - 80,000 m3/s and the annual average discharge is 30,000 m3/s. The flood water slope of the river is about 5 cm/km, transports about one billion tons of sediment every year. The average median size of the bed material at Mawa is 0.12 mm [29-34]. The down stretch is more braided and significance as the reach carries combined flow of the Jamuna and Padma Rivers [27]. The Padma is loading more sediment and the drastic erosion nature has characterized its more braiding intensity [35]. The bar depositional modeling in the braided plan form stages of the Padma River is important for the Padma Bridge construction. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to locate the bars (chars) and their duration (age) and braiding intensity on the Padma riverbed.

Data and Methodology

Digital satellite image data has been used to detect and map change and used as important tools for measuring the physical variables which promote, sustain and control change of the fluvial environment [36-40]. This study has used satellite images and GIS technology of Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS). The available satellite images of different characteristics (Table 1) between 1967 and 2009 have used for bars (chars) incidence map and char ages on the Padma riverbed.

Image Year Image Type Image Date Resolution
1967 LandSat MSS 13 January 80 m x 80 m
1973 LandSat MSS 02 February 80 m x 80 m
1976 LandSat MSS 11 January 80 m x 80 m
1980 LandSat MSS 02 February 80 m x 80 m
1984 LandSat MSS 19 March 80 m x 80 m
1989 LandSat TM 28 January 30 m x 30 m
1992 LandSat TM 04 April 30 m x 30 m
1993 LandSat TM 15 January 30 m x 30 m
1994 LandSat TM 19 January 30 m x 30 m
1995 LandSat TM 18 November 30 m x 30 m
1996 LandSat TM 18 February 30 m x 30 m
1997 LandSat TM 26 January 30 m x 30 m
1998 LandSat TM 14 February 30 m x 30 m
1999 LandSat TM 01 February 30 m x 30 m
2000 LandSat TM 19 January 30 m x 30 m
2001 LandSat TM 29 January 30 m x 30 m
2002 LandSat TM 29 January 30 m x 30 m
2003 LandSat TM 19 January 30 m x 30 m
2004 IRS LISS 06-11 December 24 m x 24 m
2005 IRS LISS 08 January 24 m x 24 m
2006 IRS LISS 05-10 February 24 m x 24 m
2007 IRS LISS 24 February-1 March 24 m x 24 m
2008 IRS LISS 09 December 24 m x 24 m
2009 IRS LISS 01 January 24 m x 24 m

Table 1: Characteristics of used satellite images.

The dry season time-series satellite images have visualized the braiding intensity by integrating the quantification of the braiding index. Brice [17] has measured the braiding intensity by braiding index (BI) is defined as follows:

BI=2(ΣLi)/Lr (1)

Where, ΣLi is the total length of bars and (or) chars in the reach, and Lr is the length of the reach measured mid-way between the banks of the river. A total braiding index of 1.50 was selected by Brice to differentiate braided from non-braided reaches [2,27]. A conceptual braiding intensity model has been developed as the sediment input in the Padma River and other morphological changes of the river system.

Results and Discussion

Char incidence and char ages

The stability of chars and a char incidence map of the Padma River have been prepared by superimposing seven classified images (water and land) acquired between 1973 and 1992. Figure 2 has shown that the chars have consistently appeared in the reaches at the south of Harirampur, northeast of Faridpur district and upstream of the Padma bridge crossing. The other reaches show frequent changes of the channels and chars. There are a few areas where chars had never existed such as at the downstream of Paturia and close to the left bank at Mawa. Stability of the chars has also assessed through the determining the age of chars by superimposing the 23 classified images acquired between 1973 and 2009. GIS technology has integrated the spatial and attributes data (Table 2) and assessed the char ages (Figure 3). Table 2 has shown that there is predominance of young chars/bars on the riverbed of below eight years (48%). Most of the short duration bars are probably related to high channel slope and magnitude of flood and severe bank erosion [2,41,42]. The longstanding chars, 8 – below 20 years by definition are almost the same (43%) that consistently appear in the char incidence map (Figure 3). But the very long duration chars are few (9%) on the river bed that have been vegetated cover and a good number of displacees have migrated in the chars [43].

Char Age (In 2009) Area (Hectare) Percentage (%)
Emerged 2009 7089 12
1 – below 4 9126 16
4 – below 8 11650 20
8 – below 12 13861 24
12 – below 16 5835 10
16 – below 20 5255 9
20 – below 24 1177 2
24 – below 28 537 1
28 – below 32 736 1
32 – below 36 574 1
36 and above 1339 2
Total 57,178 100

Table 2: Age of chars as visible in 2009 satellite images.


Figure 2: Char incidence maps for the period 1973 to 1992.


Figure 3: The char ages on the Padma river bed.

Braiding intensity

The braiding intensity is a measure of the number of anabranches in a section. Applying the equation 1 (data and methodology section) the braiding parameters and braiding intensity of the Padma River have been measured in Table 3.

Year 2 (∑Li (m) Lr (m) BI
1965 1645 1015 1.62
1970 1787 1027 1.74
1985 1485 1031 1.44
1990 2047 1039 1.97
1995 2170 1024 2.12
2000 2181 1038 2.10
2005 2046 1023 2.00

Table 3: Measured braiding parameters and braiding index of the Padma River.

The braiding intensity generally varies with the stage of the river. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the braiding intensity of the Padma River was 1.63 and 1.75 that is very close to each other (Figure 4). During 1976 to 1984, the braiding intensity dropped to a minimum, the range of which varied from 1.38 to 1.50. In this period the river was almost a single threaded straight channel. The braiding intensity started to rise very rapidly from the early 1990s and reached its peak value of 2.13 in 1997. Abandonment of the right anabranch in the middle reach upstream of Mawa caused a reduction of the braiding intensity to 2.00 in 2004. The variations in the braiding intensity of the Padma River illustrate the changes in the river’s planform pattern from the end of the 1960s. The minimum braided intensity remained as one indicating that at some reaches the river maintained a single threaded planform while on the other hand the maximum braiding intensity varied between 2 and 3. Sediment wave and braiding intensity.


Figure 4: Changes in braiding intensity of the Padma river over time.

Recent researches of Sarker and Thorne [32] and Sarker [44] showed that during the second half of twentieth century there were huge changes in width and braiding intensity of the Jamuna, Padma and Lower Meghna Rivers. They found a downstream phase lag of the occurring of the changes and concluded that these changes were due to the propagation of sediment wave generated by the Assam earthquake of 1950. The sediment wave took several decades to propagate through the Brahmaputra-Jamuna-Padma-Lower Meghna River systems and finally to reach the Bay of Bengal. Sarker and Thorne [32] and Sarker [44] also developed a conceptual model to elucidate the processes of the sediment wave and the subsequent morphological changes of the river system. They developed validated model for the Padma River is given in Figure 5.


Figure 5: Validated conceptual model showing the changes in the morphological parameters and plan form with the changes in sediment input of the Padma river.

The conceptual model shows how changes in sediment cause changes in bed level, width and braiding intensity of the river. Figure 6 presents the variations in sediment input into the Padma river at the Baruria Transect from the mid-1960s to the end of the 1980s. Rapid changes in the morphology of the river during the last few decades might not only be due to the effect of the Assam earthquake of 1950 [44]. There might be several other factors are active in this system, such as, the long-term northeast migration of the river courses and its interaction with the cohesive bank along the left bank, or the apparent cyclic behavior of the river.


Figure 6: Changes in bed material transport in the Padma river at Baruria transect.

Width of the Padma river

Maps of 1860 and 1925 showed that the river had increased its length-averaged width gradually. The gradual increase in width can be attributed to the gradual diversion of discharge of the Brahmaputra River through the Jamuna [44,45]. The length-averaged width of the Padma River was about 5.4 km in 1860. It increased by a few hundred meters in the next 65 years and reached 5.8 km (Figure 7). The range of variation between maximum and minimum widths had decreased significantly during this period and the river had attained a relatively uniform width throughout its length. From 1925 to 1952, the length-averaged width had increased to 8.4 km and the main contributor of this increment was the increase of width of the river at the Mawa section to 17 km in 1943 and 1952. During the following three decades, the width of the river reduced to 6.8 km in 1980 and the maximum width was also reduced to 12.8 km. During the last three decades the river has widened at a very high rate with the length averaged width reaching 10.5 km in 2009. More importantly, the maximum width of the river reached 21.2 km. Sarker and Thorne [32] related the recent changes in width of the river to the propagation of sediment wave generated by the 1950 Assam earthquakes. Analysis of the variation of width does not show any cyclic processes.


Figure 7: Changes in length-averaged, maximum and minimum width of the Padma river.


Observations of braiding intensity and bar morphodynamics have provided the characteristics of the recent transformed braided river of the Padma. It is observed that channel-braiding initiates with the formation of bar which are depositional in nature. At the same time the bars of the Padma River are extremely unstable and they change their position and behavior through localized erosion and accretion process. The bars are dynamic in nature and that their mobility varies spatially and temporally. Under different river stages sediment is mobilized, and accordingly shape and size are modified laterally and longitudinally. The intensity and prolongation of bar migration and/or disappear depends on the periodicity and duration of monsoon floods and flow directions. The braiding intensity oscillated over the last several decadal time scales. The increasing or decreasing of the braiding intensity changes planform pattern of the river that is important in fluvial geomorphology as well as in river training work.


  1. Coleman JM (1969) Brahmaputra river: Channel processes and sedimentation. Sedimentary Geology 3: 129-239.
  2. Islam MN (2010) Braiding morphodynamics of the Brahmaputra-Jamuna river. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  3. Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1957) River channel patterns: Braided, meandering and straight. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 282 B.
  4. Fahnestock RK (1963) Morphology and hydrology of a glacial stream–White river, Mount Rainier, Washington. US Geol Sur 422A: A1-A70.
  5. Ashmore PE (1982) Laboratory modeling of gravel braided stream morphology. Earth Surface Proc Landforms 7: 201-225.
  6. Church M, Jones D (1982) Channel bars in gravel-bed Rivers. Gravel Bed Rivers 291-338.
  7. Rundle A (1985b) Braided morphology and the formation of multiple channels, the Rakaia, New Zealand. J Geomorph 55: 15-37.
  8. Ferguson RI (1993) Understanding braiding processes in gravel-bed Rivers: progress and unsolved problems. Geol Soc London Spec Pub 75: 73-87.
  9. Thorne CR, Russel APG, Alam MK (1993) Planform pattern and channel evaluation of the Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh. Geol Soc London Spec Pub 75: 257-276.
  10. Jiongixn X (1997) Study of sedimentation zones in a large sand-bed braided river: An example from the Hanjiang River of China. Geomorph 21: 153-165.
  11. Ferguson RI, Werrity A (1983) Bar development and channel changes in the gravelly rivers Feshie, Scotland. Int Ass Sedimentologists 6: 181-193.
  12. Ashworth PJ, Ferguson RI (1986) Interrelationships of channel processes, changes and sediments in a proglacial river. Geografiska Annaler 68A: 361-371.
  13. Bristow CS (1987) Brahmaputra River: Channel Migration and Deposition. Soc Econ Palaeontologists and Mineralogists 39: 63-64.
  14. Goff JR, Ashmore PE (1994) Gravel transport and morphological change in braided Sunwapta River, Alberta, Canada. Earth Sur Proc Landforms 19: 195-212.
  15. Asworth PJ, Best JL, Roden JE, Bristow CS, Klaassen GJ, et al. (2000) Morphological evolution and dynamics of a large, sand braid-bar, Jamuna River, Bangladesh. Sedimentology 47: 533-555.
  16. Brice JC (1964) Channel patterns and terraces of the Loup Rivers in Nebraska. US Geol Sur 422-D: 1-41.
  17. Howard AD, Keetch ME, Vincent CL (1970) Topological and geometrical properties of braided rivers. Water Resou Res 6: 1674-1688.
  18. Engelund F, Skovgaard O (1973) On the origin of meandering and braided in alluvial streams. J Fluvial Mech 57: 289-302.
  19. Rust BR (1978a) A classification of alluvial channel systems. Fluvial Sedimentology 5: 187-198.
  20. Hong LB, Davies TRH (1979) A study of stream braiding.GSA Bulletin 79: 391-394.
  21. Mosley MP (1981) Semi-determinate hydraulic geometry of river channels, South Island, New Zealand. Earth Sur Proc Landforms 6: 127-137.
  22. Richards KS (1985) Rivers: Forms and Processes in Alluvial Channels. Methuen, London 361.
  23. Fujita Y (1989) Bar and channel formation in braided streams. Water Resour Monographs 12: 417-462.
  24. Friend PF, Sinha R (1993) Braiding and meandering parameters. Geol Soc Spec Publ 75: 105-111.
  25. Robertson-Rintoul MSE, Richards KS (1993) Braided-channel pattern and palaeohydrology using an index of total sinuosity. Geol Soc Spec Publ 75: 113-118.
  26. Yeasmin A, Islam MN (2011) Changing trends of channel pattern of the Ganges-Padma river. Int J Geomat Geosci 2: 669-675.
  27. EGIS (1997) Morphological Dynamics of the Brahmaputra-Jamuna River. Environmental and GIS Support Project for Water Sector Planning (EGIS and Delft Hydraulics), Ministry of Water Resources, Government of Bangladesh. 1-66.
  28. Delft Hydraulics, DHI (1996a) Floodplain levels and bankfull discharge. Special Report No. 6, River Survey Project (FAP 24), Prepared for Water Resources Planning Organization (WARPO), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  29. Delft Hydraulics, DHI (1996c) Morphological processes in the Jamuna River, Special Report No. 24, River Survey Project (FAP 24), Prepared for Water Resources Planning Organization (WARPO), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  30. Delft Hydraulics, DHI (1996g), Bed material sampling in Ganges, Padma, Old Brahmaputra and Jamuna, Special Report No. 8, River Survey Project (FAP 24), Prepared for WARPO, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  31. Sarker MH, Thorne CR (2006) Morphological Response of Brhamaputra-Padma-Lower Meghna River stem to the Assam earthquake of 1950. Intern Assoc Sedimentologists 289-310.
  32. Rahman MM, Islam MN, Islam MN (2016) Integrated approach of remote sensing and field survey data in assessment of bank erosion intensity of the Padma river in Bangladesh. Int J Geom Geosci 7: 285-297.
  33. Rahman MM, Islam MN (2017) Bank erosion pattern analysis by delineation of course migration of the Padma River at Harirampur Upazila Using Satellite Images and GIS Part II. J Geol Geophys 6: 284.
  34. CEGIS (2015) Prediction of River, Bank Erosion and Morphological Changes along the Jamuna, the Ganges, the Padma and the Lower Meghna Rivers in 2015.
  35. Milton EJ, Gilvear DJ, Hooper ID (1995) Investigating change in fluvial systems using remotely sensed data. Chang River Chann 277- 301.
  36. Nellis MD, Harrington JA, Wu J (1998) Remote sensing of temporal and spatial variations in pool size, suspended sediment, turbidity, and Secchi depth in Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Kansas: 1993. Geomorphology 21: 281-293.
  37. Walsh SJ, Butler DR, Malanson GP (1998) An overview of scale, pattern, process relationships in geomorphology: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Geomorphology 21: 183-205.
  38. Goswami U, Sarma JN, Patgiri AD (1999) River channel changes of Subansiri in Assam, India. Geomorphology 30: 227-244.
  39. Wright A, Marcus WA, Aspinall R (2000) Evaluation of multi-spectral, fine scale digital imagery as a tool for mapping stream morphology. Geomorphology 33: 107-120.
  40. Rust BR (1972) Structure and processes in a braided river. Sedimentology. 18: 221-245.
  41. Smith ND (1974) Sedimentology and bar formation in the upper Kicking Horse River, a braided outwash stream. J Geol 82: 205-224.
  42. Rahman MM (2015) Interrelationship between Hazard and Environmental Degradation: A Geo-ecological Appraisal on Manikganj District. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  43. Sarker MH (2009) Morphological response of the Brahmaputra-Jamuna-Padma- Lower Meghna River to the Assam earthquake of 1950. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.
  44. CEGIS JMREMP (2009) Prediction of River Bank Erosion along the Jamuna, the Ganges and the Padma Rivers in 2009.

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.