Correlation between Endometrial Thickness and IVF Outcome in an A
Gynecology & Obstetrics

Gynecology & Obstetrics
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0932

Research Article - (2012) Volume 2, Issue 2

Correlation between Endometrial Thickness and IVF Outcome in an African Population

Osemwenkha AP* and Osaikhuwuomwan JA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: Osemwenkha AP, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin, Nigeria Email:


Background: The endometrium undergoes cyclic changes during the menstrual cycle in preparation for implantation. Successful implantation depends on a close interaction between the embryo and the receptive endometrium. The association between endometrial thickness and IVF outcome was investigated in this study.

Objective: To study the prognostic effect of endometrial thickness on outcome of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles

Method: A retrospective analysis of 267 IVF/ICSI cycles between 2009 and 2011 at Human reproductive research program of University of Benin Teaching Hospital was conducted. Cycle parameters were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant patients, main outcome measure being clinical pregnancy following IVF cycles. The endometrial thickness was measured on the day of human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (hCG) administration. The clinical pregnancy rates at each millimeter of endometrial thickness was evaluated to determine its predictive role

Results: Fifty-four among 267 cycles (20.2%) resulted in clinical pregnancy. The endometrial thickness on day of hCG administration was significantly higher in pregnant group compared to non-pregnant group [10.1 ± 1.7 mm versus 8.9 ± 2.0; p<0.0001). The endometrial thickness cut-off value of at least 7 mm strongly correlated with clinical pregnancy.

Conclusion: Amongst other factors a thicker endometrial lining is associated with higher pregnancy rates. Effort should be made to institute protocols that will improve endometrial growth as a means of improving cycle outcome.

Keywords: Endometrial thickness, IVF cycles, Pregnancy, Infertility, Ultrasound


Since the advent of assisted reproduction advances have been made in areas of ovarian stimulation regimen, method of assisted fertilization and improved culture techniques, yet the implantation potential of good quality embryo remains low. Several factors have been shown to influence the likelihood of implantation, one of which is endometrial receptivity [1]. In preparation for implantation the endometrium undergoes cyclic changes during the menstrual cycle. Successful implantation depends on a close interaction between the blastocyst and the receptive endometrium. Abnormalities of the endometrium such as asherman’s syndrome that may prevent these changes have been associated with low implantation and high abortion rates [2].

Ultrasound evaluation of the endometrium during In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles have been shown to be of clinical importance [3,4]. Albeit there is still no consensus on the correlation between endometrial characteristics and pregnancy rate demonstrated by several studies [5-14]. Some authors observed a greater probability of pregnancy once a threshold thickness is attained [5-10]. A threshold thickness of 7 mm and above was reported as positively predictive of pregnancy [15]. Noyes et al. and Rinaldi et al. [2,5] in their studies found significant pregnancy at endometrial thickness of 10 mm and above. Some other studies have failed to demonstrate any correlation between endometrial thickness and pregnancy [13,14]. Furthermore other workers have looked at the combined predictive role of endometrial thickness and pattern [16].

We sought to document our observations on the predictive value of endometrial thickness on outcome of IVF cycle. Ours is a developing nation, and with declining low socioeconomic state, there exist a huge financial burden on most of our clients. Thus in a low cost IVF setting like ours this study will impact on counseling and treatment planning in order to maximize potential for successful outcome.



The Human Reproduction Research Programme [HRRP] is one of the four academic units of the department of obstetrics and gynaecology of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. It is a purpose built dedicated centre for infertility research and management in a public institution with provision for low cost IVF service.

Study population

Cycles of In vitro fertilization/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) conducted between 2008 and 2011 at the HRRP, were reviewed retrospectively. The Institutions local Review Board approval for the study was obtained. All fresh IVF or ICSI treatment cycles that used the long protocol (midluteal phase GnRH-agonist suppression) as the method of ovarian stimulation and reached oocyte pick up and embryo transfer within the study period were included, regardless of diagnosis, reproductive history, or insemination method.

Cycles using donor oocytes or cryopreserved embryos were excluded from this study. Other exclusion criteria included: the presence of known endometrial anomalies such as endometrial polyp or submucous myoma, and ovarian stimulation method other than the long protocol.

Protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)

Pituitary down regulation [after synchronization of their menstrual cycles with sequential estrogen and progesterone to allow for batching] was with the GnRHa started in the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle and was continued through the follicular phase of the next cycle until the day of hCG administration. Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation (COH) with menopur was started on day 3 of the current cycle in an individual step-down protocol until a dominant follicle reached a diameter of 18 mm. Ovulation was triggered with 10,000 IU of hCG.

Follicular maturation and endometrial thickness were monitored by transvaginal ultrasound (Mindray®, model DP-6600 Shangai) examination at intervals, from day 6 to the day of hCG-administration. Endometrial thickness was measured in the midsagittal plane of the uterine body on the day of hCG administration. The largest thickness from one interface of the endometrial-myometrial junction to the other was measured.

Oocyte retrieval was performed via an ultrasound guided transvaginal approach 35 hours after hCG administration. Fortyeight hours after oocyte retrieval, embryos in transfer medium were implanted into the uterine cavity, and the recipient then rested in bed for 2-4 hours. Vaginal progesterone suppositories (400 mg/day) was started on the day of oocyte retrieval to provide luteal support and was continued daily until a pregnancy test was performed 15 days after embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy was confirmed by identification of an intrauterine gestational sac by transvaginal ultrasound examination two weeks after positive pregnancy test.

For this study, the main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy. Cycle parameters were compared between pregnant and non pregnant patients.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and INSTAT stastical package as appropriate, all tests were two-tailed, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD and were tested by the independent samples Student’s T-test. Categorical data were expressed as numbers and compared using the Chi-square test. The predictive accuracy of endometrial thickness to predict the probability of pregnancy was assessed.


A total of 267 IVF/ICSI cycles that met the inclusion criteria for this study were analysed. Overall 63 [23.6%] cycles resulted in a positive pregnancy test, of which 54 had pregnancy confirmation by identification of an intrauterine gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasound examination; clinical pregnancy rate was 20.2% and 9[3.4%] biochemical pregnancies. The biochemical pregnancies were regarded as negative pregnancy and excluded from the pregnant group in analysis. The age of patients ranged between 23 and 47, with mean age of 35.7 ± 5.0 and modal age of 38.

Table 1 shows a comparative analysis of cycles that eventuated in clinical pregnancy [pregnant] and those that did not [non pregnant]. The mean age between the groups showed that the pregnant group had significantly lower age 34.3 ± 4.3 vs 36.1 ± 5.1, (p = 0.02). Comparison of baseline characteristics between pregnant and non pregnant patient (Table 1) revealed no significant difference in characters such as type of infertility, previous children and duration of infertility. Although majority had female factor infertility [46.8%], there was no statistical difference in causal factors among the two groups. There was no difference in the mean baseline FSH, the total dose of FSH used in ovarian stimulation and number of mature follicles. The number of eggs retrieved were higher in the pregnant group, (p = 0.0002). In vitro fertilization was more common compared to ICSI [84.3% vs 15.7%] but this was not significant statistically.

  Clinical Preg [n=54] No Preg [n=213] % P value
Mean 34.3±4.3 36.1±5.1   0.02*
Type of infert        
1 8 59 67[25%]  
2 46 154 200[75%] 0.0545
Dura of infert        
[range 1-20] 6.3±3.6 7.1±4.3   0.1649
Prev children        
Yes 8 52 60[22%] 0.1476
No 46 161 207[78%]  
Cause of infert        
Female 26 99 125[46.8%]  
Male 9 33 42[15.7%]  
Combined 17 75 92[34.5%] 0.9503
Unexplained 2 6 8[3.0%]  
Basal fsh 9.3±7.3 11.7±9.5   0.095
[range 1-69]        
Total fsh dose 51.4±14.5 60.4±17.7   0.07*
[range 18-105]        
Follicle size>17mm 10.5±4.8 11.8±6.7   0.1063
Num of egg retrieved 8.2±5.2 5.2±4.4   0.0002*
[range 0-30]
[Mean 5.8±4.7]
Num fertilized 4.5±2.2 3.6±2.3   0.120
Ivf 42 183 225[84%]  
Icsi 12 29 42[16%] 0.1473
Quality of embryo        
Excellent/good 40 128 168[62.92%] 0.046*
Good/reasonable 14 68 82[30.71%]  
Poor/reasonable 0 17 17[6.37%]  
Easy 30 144 174[65.4%]  
Moderate 24 58 82[30.8%] 0.022*
Difficult 0 10 10[3.8%]  
Endometrial thickness[mm]        
[mean 9.2±2.0] 10.1±1.7 8.9±2.0   0.0001*
[range 5.3-18]        
*Statistically significant

Table 1: comparison of cycle parameters between the pregnant and non pregnant group.

The endometrial thickness for the entire study group ranged between 5.3 mm and 18 mm with an average of 9.2 ± 2.0 mm. The mean endometrial thickness in the pregnant and non pregnant groups was 10.1 ± 1.7 mm and 8.9 ± 2.0 mm respectively and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). There was significant difference in terms of transfer technique and number of embryo’s transferred between the two groups. The pregnant group significantly had better quality embryos transferred p = 0.0461. The process of transcervical transfer of embryos was graded as easy, moderate or difficult depending on the technical difficulties encountered. It was observed that there were more easy transfers for the pregnant group and no difficult transfer procedure recorded for this group in comparison to the non pregnant group and this was significant.

In Table 2, There was no pregnancy at endometrial thickness <7 mm whereas the non pregnant group had endometrial thickness <7 mm in 12% of the patients. The endometrial thickness value of ≥ 7 mm to <12 mm was significantly associated with pregnancy as there was no significant correlation with pregnancy when it is ≥ 12 mm or <7mm. Endometrial thickness cut-off value 10

Endometrial thickness
Preg n=54 No preg n=213 Preg rate
P value OR 95% CI Sen
Spec (%) PPV (%) NPV
22.9 0.0013 18.814 [1.132-312.73] 14.5 100 100 22.8  
6 48 72 141 25.4 0.0007 0.2448 [0.100-
11.1 66.2 7.7 74.6 0.33
16 38 113 100 27.5 0.002 0.373 [0.196-0.709] 29.6 46.9 12.4 72.5 0.558
26 28 153 60 31.8 0.002 0.364 [0.197-0.671] 48.1 28.2 14.5 68.2 0.670
36 18 181 32 36.0 0.003 0.3536 [0.179-0.698] 66.7 15 16.6 64 0.784
45 9 193 20 31.0 0.142 0.518 [0.221-1.214] 83.3 9 18.9 69 0.92
53 1 204 9 10.0 0.692 2.338 [0.289-18.876] 98.1 4 20.6 90 1.025
53 1 207 6 14.3 1.000 1.536 [0.181-13.043] 98.1 2.8 20.4 85.7 1.01
54 0 211 2 0 1.000 1.288 [0.061-27.251] 100 0.94 20.4 100 1.009
Preg (pregnancy), OR;(odds ratio), sen(sensitivity), spec(specificity), PPV(positive predictive value), NPV(negative predictive value), CI(confidence interval), LR(likelihood ratio)

Table 2: Likelihood of clinical pregnancy at each millimeter of endometrial thickness.

Logistic regression analysis was evaluated to clinical pregnancy as dependent variable and variables which showed statistical association with pregnancy (shown in Table 1) included as independent variables. Those variables were patient’s age, endometrial thickness, number of oocyte retrieved, quality of embryos and transfer difficulties. The endometrial thickness showed a significant independent influence on successful pregnancy (Table 3).

Variable B
Logistic regression coefficient
S.E Wald P value exp (B) 95% CI
for exp B
Age -0.007 0.038 0.032 0.857 0.993 0.923-1.069
Endometrial thickness 0.177 0.088 4.069 0.044* 1.194 1.005-1.418
Number of eggs retrieved 0.127 0.038 11.224 0.001* 1.136 1.054-1.224
Transfer difficulty 0.574 0.350 2.701 0.100 1.766 0.895-3.523
Embryo quality 20.572 9296.75 0.000 0.998 8.598 0.000
*Statistically significant

Table 3: logistic regression model.


Endometrial thickness has been identified to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization cycles and by extension successful pregnancy. The predictive value of endometrial thickness in IVF cycle is strengthened by this study where we observed a significant independent association between endometrial thickness and rate of clinical pregnancy. The fact that the mean endometrial thickness was significantly higher for the pregnant group and an observed pregnancy rate highest at endometrial thickness of between 10-12 mm in this study, suggests that a thicker endometrial lining correlates strongly with pregnancy. An endometrial thickness above 7 mm was highly predictive of pregnancy. Our finding is similar to that observed in one of the largest study conducted to assess the combined effect of endometrial thickness and pattern on outcome of IVF cycles, where endometrial thickness had an independent positive correlation with pregnancy rate [16]. Several other investigators have reported similar findings [2,7,8]. However controversies still exist as regards getting a defined minimum cut off endometrial thickness predictive of successful pregnancy. Chen et al. [16] in their analysis found that the thinnest endometrial lining for successful ongoing pregnancy was 5.3 mm and further evaluation of clinical pregnancy rates according to each millimeter of endometrial thickness, showed an endometrial thickness threshold of 7 mm, below which pregnancy rates decreased rapidly. Reuter et al. reported that no patient conceived with endomterial thickness less than 8 mm [15]. In contrast other investigators have found a minimum thickness of 6 mm as an acceptable prerequisite for implantation [17,18]. Sundstorm [19] actually reported a successful pregnancy with an endometrial thickness as little as 4 mm but Dickey et al. [20] observed more frequent biochemical pregnancies with a thinner endometrium and an improved pregnancy rate with a thicker endometrium.

In this study, we found that an endometrial thickness of at least 7 mm increases the likelihood for pregnancy and pregnancy rates were higher when an endometrial thickness of at least 105,6,20,21]. Paradoxically we observed a slight decline in pregnancy rate when thickness was above 13 mm, suggesting the possibility of a detrimental effect of very thick endometrial lining. Similar to our finding okohue et al. and Weissman et al. [10,14] while evaluating the effect of ‘increased’ endometrial thickness on IVF outcome reported lower implantation and pregnancy rates among women with an endometrial thickness >14 mm on the day of hCG administration. However, some authors have documented no adverse effect of markedly thickened endometrium on implantation, pregnancy or abortion rate [16,22,23]. We however, did not review the abortion and live birth rate in this study.

Despite the body of literature that suggests a positive correlation between a thicker endometrial lining and improved clinical pregnancy rates in IVF cycles, some studies have showed no significant association between endometrial thickness and rate of clinical pregnancy [9,11,12,24]. These lack of consensus in reports on the association between endometrial thickness and cycle outcome may be explained by differences in the method analysis. Some studies evaluated cut-off values [5,6,24], while others compared mean endometrial thickness [9,11] or compared endometrial thickness among percentile groups [24]. These different criteria might affect power to detect a small variation. In addition the day of measurement might also influence this conflict of results. Measurements could be made on the day of oocyte retrieval, the day of embryo transfer or on the day of hCG injection. Also various measurement methods (including outer edge to outer edge, or outer edge to inner edge) could further affect reported results. Furthermore other ultrasound parameters [such as endometrial pattern, volume and blood flow] could be utilized for evaluation of endometrial receptivity in addition to endometrial thickness.

Perhaps a review of research articles that used same methodology (in a bid to ensure uniformity) would resolve the present conflict of research findings. From the foregoing it is clear that allocating a minimum cut off endometrial thickness predictive of successful pregnancy may be difficult. Albeit a growing consensus of report tends towards accepting an endometrial thickness of at least 7 mm as being favourable.

An association of various cycle characteristics and treatment outcome has been evaluated since the introduction of assisted reproduction technologies. We observed that in addition to endometrial thickness, variables such as age, number of eggs retrieved, embryo quality and transfer difficulties also had significant impact on cycle outcome. Age has been strongly identified to influence IVF outcome [25,26]. In this study pregnancy rate decreased as age increased, similar to the results of previous research [2,7,8]. This trend is in line with expected physiological reproductive potential where follicular response/ maturation to controlled ovarian stimulation can be predicted as a function of age. Also we noticed a trend where in cycles that resulted in pregnancy, the patients were younger, had more oocytes retrieved, thicker endometrial lining, had better quality embryos transferred, and a less difficult transfer process. Similar to our findings, Kovacs et al. [2] had posited that although increased endometrial thickness is associated with higher pregnancy rates; neither the attainment of pregnancy nor pregnancy outcome was predicted by endometrial thickness alone. Endometrial thickness have been shown in the logistic regression model to significantly influence pregnancy independently [2,23]. This was corroborated in this study

In conclusion, we observed that overall, a thicker endometrial lining during IVF cycles correlated strongly with successful outcome. Also an endometrial thickness of at least 7 mm improved the probability of clinical pregnancy. We therefore advocate that in IVF centres (especially low cost centres like ours), effort should be made to institute protocols that will improve endometrial growth as a means of improving cycle outcome.


  1. Strowitzki T, Germeyer A, Popovici R, von Wolff M (2006) The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor. Hum Reprod update 12: 617-630.
  2. Kovacs P, Matyas S, Boda K, Kaali SG (2003) The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod 18: 2337-2341.
  3. Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, Lewin A (1996) The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update 2: 323-334.
  4. Oliveira JB, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Borges MC, et al. (1997) Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and gonadotrophins. Human Reprod 12: 2515-2518.
  5. Noyes N, Liu HC, Sultan K, Schattman G, Rosenwaks Z (1995)Endometrial thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 10: 919-922.
  6. Rinaldi L, Lisi F, Floccari A, Lisi R, Pepe G, et al. (1996) Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization but not after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 11: 1538-1541.
  7. Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ (2007) Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril 87: 53-59.
  8. Rashidi BH, Sadeghi M, Jafarabadi M, Tehrani Nejad ES (2005) Relationships between pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and pattern. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120: 179-184.
  9. Yuval Y, Lipitz S, Dor J, Achiron R (1999) The relationships between endometrial thickness, and blood flow and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 14: 1067-1071.
  10. Okohue JE, Onuh SO, Ebeigbe P, Shaibu I, Wada I, et al. (2009) The effect of endometrial thickness on in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Afr J Reprod Health 13: 113-121.
  11. Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, van der Ven H, et al. (2001) Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil Steril 75: 361-366.
  12. Bassil S (2001) Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18: 258-263.
  13. Yaman C, Ebner T, Jesacher K, Sommergruber M, Radner G, et al. (2002) [Sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness as a predictive value for pregnancy through IVF]. Ultraschall Med 23: 256-259.
  14. Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper RF (1999) The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 71: 147-149.
  15. Reuter H, Cohen S, Furey L, Baker S (1996) sonographic appearance of the endometrium and ovaries during cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin. J Reprod Med 41: 509-514.
  16. Shi-Ling Chen, Fang-Rong Wu, Chen Luo, Xin Chen, Xiao-Yun Shi, et al. (2010) Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8: 30.
  17. Coulam CB, Bustillo M, Soenksen DM, Britten S (1994) Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 62: 1004-1010.
  18. Gonen Y, Capsper RF (1990) Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 7: 146-152.
  19. Sundstorm P (1998) Establishment of a successful pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization with an endometrial thickness of no more than 4 mm. Hum Reprod 13: 1550-1552.
  20. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH (1992) Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 7: 418-421.
  21. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe J, Lurie D, Dietterich C (1993) The effect of endometrial thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 59: 72-75.
  22. Dietterich C, Check JH, Choe JK, Nazari A, Lurie D (2002) Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 77: 781-786.
  23. Wiweko B, Hestiantoro A, Natadisastra M, Sumapradja K, Mansyur E, et al. (2010) Not only embryo quality but also Endometrial Thickness Contributes to IVF outcome: a retrospective study of all IVF cycles in Yasmin Clinic, Jakarta, Indonesia. Indones J Obstet Gynecol 34: 39-42.
  24. De Geyter C, Schmitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, et al. (2000) Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women. Fertil Steril 73: 106-113.
  25. Chuang CC, Chen CD, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, et al. (2003) Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 79: 63-68.
  26. Habibzadeh V, Mahani SN, Kamyabi H (2011) The correlation of factors affecting the endometrial thickness with pregnancy outcome in the IUI cycles. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 9: 41-46.
Citation: Osemwenkha AP, Osaikhuwuomwan JA (2012) Correlation between Endometrial Thickness and IVF Outcome in an African Population. Gynecol Obstet 2:119.

Copyright: © 2012 Osemwenkha AP, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.