Sociology and Criminology-Open Access
Open Access

Atavism: An Exploration of Primitive Traits Resurfacing in Modern Society

Lydia Mian^{* *}Correspondence: Lydia Mian, Department of Sociology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria, Email:

Author info »

About the Study

Atavism refers to the reappearance of ancestral traits in modernday individuals. These traits can be physical, behavioral or even psychological in nature. Atavism is not limited to humans but can be observed in various species, and it is a phenomenon that has been studied by scientists for many years. We will explore the concept of atavism, its origins, and how it manifests in today's society [1].

Origins of atavism

Atavism can be traced back to the theories of Charles Darwin, who proposed the concept of "reversion" in his book, "The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication." Darwin believed that traits that were once present in an organism's ancestors could reappear after being absent for generations. He observed this phenomenon in domesticated animals and plants, but the concept was later extended to humans as well [2].

Physical atavism

Physical atavism refers to the reappearance of ancestral physical traits in modern-day individuals. These traits can include things like extra fingers or toes, webbed feet, or even a tail. While these physical traits are rare in humans, they can be observed in other species such as reptiles and birds. Some scientists believe that the reason for the reappearance of these traits is due to the reactivation of genes that were once turned off [3].

Behavioral atavism

Behavioral atavism refers to the reappearance of ancestral behavioral traits in modern-day individuals. These traits can include things like aggression, territoriality, and even cannibalism. While these behaviors are not considered socially acceptable in modern society, they were once necessary for survival in our ancestors' environments. Some scientists believe that the reappearance of these behaviors is due to the influence of genetics and environmental factors [4].

Psychological atavism

Psychological atavism refers to the reappearance of ancestral psychological traits in modern-day individuals. These traits can include things like superstitions, phobias, and even beliefs in supernatural beings. While these beliefs may seem irrational in modern society, they were once necessary for survival in our ancestors' environments [5]. Some scientists believe that the reappearance of these beliefs is due to the influence of culture and environmental factors.

Atavism in modern society

While atavism is a natural phenomenon that has been observed in many species, it is important to note that not all primitive traits are desirable in modern society [6]. For example, aggression and territoriality may have been necessary for survival in the past, but they are not acceptable behaviors in today's society. It is also important to note that not all individuals exhibit atavistic traits and those that do may not exhibit them in the same way [7]. Atavism is a natural phenomenon that refers to the reappearance of ancestral traits in modern-day individuals. These traits can be physical, behavioral, or psychological in nature, and they are observed in many species. While atavism is a natural phenomenon, it is important to note that not all primitive traits are desirable in modern society. We can better comprehend the intricate interactions between genetics, culture, and environment that determine who we are as individuals if we continue to understand more about atavism. Atavism is a complex and controversial concept that has both positive and negative implications for modern society. While atavistic traits can provide individuals with useful skills or instincts, they can also lead to irrational fears or dangerous behavior [8].

References

1. Cunningham CW, Omland KE, Oakley TH. Reconstructing ancestral character states: A critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998; 13(9):361–366.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

2. Lemey P, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA. Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. Plos Comput Biol. 2009; 5(9):e1000520.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

3. Huelsenbeck JP, Bollback JP. Empirical and Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of Ancestral States. Syst Biol. 2001; 50(3):351-366.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

4. Hahn MW, Nakhleh L. Irrational exuberance for resolved species trees. Evolution.2016;70(1):7–17.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

5. Duchêne S, Lanfear R. Phylogenetic uncertainty can bias the number of evolutionary transitions estimated from ancestral state reconstruction methods. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2015; 324(6):517–524.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

6. Yang Z. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J Mol Evol. 1996; 42(2):294–307.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

7. Schluter D, Price T, Mooers AØ, Ludwig D. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution. 1997; 51(6):1699–1711.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar][PubMed]

8. Cunningham CW. Some limitations of ancestral character-state reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 1999; 48(3):665–674.

   [Crossref][GoogleScholar]