GET THE APP

Antidotal Effect of Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA on Workers Exposed to
Journal of Clinical Toxicology

Journal of Clinical Toxicology
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0495

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2015) Volume 5, Issue 2

Antidotal Effect of Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA on Workers Exposed to Lead, Cadmium and Arsenic

Georgieva VG*, Boyadzhieva V, Kuneva T and Pavlova S
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment “St. Iv. Rilski” Sofia, Bulgaria
*Corresponding Author: Georgieva VG, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment “St. Iv. Rilski” Sofia, Bulgaria, Tel: +359888988665 Email:

Abstract

A comparative evaluation was made between the antidotal effect of Succimer and СаNа2 EDTA on workers, exposed simultaneously to lead, arsenic and cadmium. The studied patients were divided into two groups: 1st group -15 individuals, treated with peroral administration of Succimer (DMSA) in a dosage of 2.1 grams per day (3 × 0.7 grams) during the first 5 days and in a dosage of 1.4 grams (2 × 0.7 grams) per day from the 6th to the 20th day; and 2nd group -20 individuals who underwent 3-day intravenous therapy, 1 gram of СаNа2 EDTA per day. Blood concentrations of lead, cadmium, arsenic, copper and zinc were measured before and after therapy, observing their urinary excretion as well. The data obtained show that both drugs have a pronounced antidotal effect on lead. The chelating effect of Succimer on arsenic is much better than that of СаNа2 EDTA. The therapy with Succimer does not lead to higher excretion of copper and zinc in urine, in comparison to СаNа2 EDTA. Appropriate for workers with low-level exposure to lead is a 7-day course of treatment with Succimer in a dosage of 2.1 grams per day.

Keywords: Succimer; CaNa2 EDTA; Arsenic and Cadmium

Introduction

The classic antidote used in lead poisoning is CaNa2EDTA [1-7]. In patients with contraindications for its administration (thrombophlebitis, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, etc.) it is especially important to use other drugs with decorporating efficacy [8-15]. In the literature, one finds a series of studies on the effect of various antidotes, such as trisodium salt of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [16-19], 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA, Succimer, Chemet ) [6,8,9,11,19,], d-Penicillamin [1,10]. We found no data about its application as an antidote in workers, exposed simultaneously to metals. Therefore, we aimed at comparing, in a clinical environment, the curative effect of Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA on workers, exposed to lead, cadmium and arsenic, with no visible clinical signs of intoxication.

Materials and Methods

The study covers 35 workers from a metallurgical plant, exposed to the combined effects of lead, arsenic and cadmium. The selected workers are hospitalized in the Clinic of Occupational Diseases, having no evidence of alcohol or drug abuse and no major organ damage. The studied individuals are divided into two groups:

• 1st group- 15 individuals (average age of 39 ± 8 and specialized length of service 14 ± 7.8 years) were treated with Succimer. The drug was taken orally in a dosage of 2.1 grams per day (3 × 0.7 grams) during the first 5 days and in a dosage of 1.4 grams (2 × 0.7 grams) per day from the 6th to the 20th day.

• 2nd group- 20 individuals (average age of 43.5 ± 5 and average specialized length of service 18.5 ± 6 years) passed a 3-day intravenous therapy with CaNa2 EDTA in a dosage of 1 gram per day.

For all workers, blood and urine concentrations of lead, cadmium, arsenic, copper and zinc were studied, before and after therapy.

The heavy metals were determined using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy Analyst 400 Perkin Elmer.

The processing of the results was made by variation analysis-paired sample t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using Origin 9.0. The quantitative variables are presented as mean ± SD, and the categorical variables are presented as number (%). P-values less than 0.05 are considered statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

The average content of lead in the blood (plumbemia) of the exposed individuals before treatment is in the same range in both groups: for the 1st group - 1.03 ± 0.08 and for the 2nd group - 1.17 ± 0.1μmol/l, thus allowing a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of the two antidotes (Figure 1). On the fifth day after the start of administration of the drugs the level of lead reliably decreases (p<0.05) and is 0.71 ± 0.4 and 0.73 ± 0.09 μmol/l, respectively, i.e. in the said peroral dosage Succimer shows equal efficacy to the intravenously applied CaNa2 EDTA. On the 20th day of the treatment with Succimer the lead content in blood reliably decreases (p<0.05) compared to the 5th day, reaching 0.38 ± 0.06 μmol/l.

clinical-toxicology-treatment-Succimer

Figure 1: Pb in blood before and after treatment with Succimer and СаNа2 EDTA.

The results from the daily administration of Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA show a significant increase in lead excretion for both groups of workers. In all studied days of the treatment the plumburia is many times higher than the basal (Figure 2). It is worth noting that with both antidotes the maximum release of lead is to be observed in the first day and then the excretion gradually decreases. It should be emphasized that after the third intravenous application of CaNa2 EDTA the lead content is still much higher than the baseline (p<0.001).

clinical-toxicology-therapy-Succimer

Figure 2: Pb in urine after therapy with Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA.

In the Succimer treatment after the 5th day is observed a balanced release of lead. After 10 days of drug administration the concentrations of lead in urine reach the reference values, thus indicating the efficacy of the drug at longer administration, very well tolerated and with no danger for the patients. Similar are the results obtained by Restek S et al. in treatment with DMSA - acceleration of urinary lead excretion, mostly during the first five days, followed by a decline in the average plumbemia up to 15% of the levels before the treatment - and they assume that DMSA may effectively reduce chelate lead in occupationally exposed workers.

In the application of both antidotes the average released arsenic content is not above the reference values (1.47 μmol/l), although it is higher than the basal. With one exception, the application of CaNa2 EDTA does not lead to higher excretion above 1.47 μmol/l. Peroral administration of Succimer, however, leads to its increased release compared to the baseline in the first 5 days of the treatment (p<0.05) (Figure 3). The individual analysis shows that in 6 out of 15 studied patients the released amount is 2 to 3 times higher than the reference values. It is noteworthy to point out the reliably (p<0.05) higher excretion of arsenic at therapy with Succimer in comparison to CaNa2 EDTA, which is an evidence of the better chelating effect of Succimer with respect to arsenic.

clinical-toxicology-urine-therapy

Figure 3: As in urine after therapy with Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA.

Observing the urine excretion of zinc of workers, treated with CaNa2 EDTA, striking is the fact of its massive loss (Figure 4). The concentration of zinc on the first day is 155 ± 24 μmol/l, on the second - 114+7 μmol/l and on the third - 125 ± 26 μmol/l, compared to the basal 8 ± 1.5 μmol/l. Zincuria upon the application of CaNa2 EDTA is also reported by other authors, (Graziano JH) [2,3,8]. The zinc content in the urine of the individuals, taking Succimer throughout all 20 consecutive days of treatment, is low-less than 10-15 μmol/l, undergoing no significant changes.

clinical-toxicology-Zn-urine-therapy

Figure 4: Zn in urine after therapy with Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA.

The release of copper, upon application of both antidotes, is higher than the baseline; however, it is within the range of the reference values. No statistically significant variations were established with respect to the concentrations of cadmium in both groups of individuals, either. The levels of copper and zinc in blood before and after the therapy are within the range of the reference values, which is evidence that they are extracted from the depots of the organism (Figure 5).

clinical-toxicology-Cu-Zn-blood

Figure 5: Cu and Zn in blood before and after treatment with Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA.

Conclusion

A comparative evaluation is made between the antidotal effect of Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA on workers, exposed simultaneously to lead, arsenic and cadmium. The studied drugs show a marked antidotal effect on lead. The chelating effect of Succimer on arsenic is much better, compared to CaNa2 EDTA.

The treatment with Succimer results in no change in the excretion of copper and zinc, while CaNa2 EDTA causes daily 10 to 15-times higher release of zinc with the urine than the reference values.

Succimer (DMSA) is an effective chelator, leading to expressed plumburia, suitable for peroral administration, and may be used with patients who are not hospitalized, due to absence of manifested side effects.

In workers with a low-level lead exposure, a 7-day therapy with Succimer is appropriate, in a dosage of 2.1 grams per day.

Patients with symptoms of lead intoxication and high-level lead absorption are recommended a therapy with CaNa2 EDTA for rapid and effective decorporating chelation therapy, with parallel administration of substitution therapy with microelements (copper and zinc).

References

  1. Kuneva T (1993) The therapeutic effect evaluation of Cuprenil on chronic saturnism, Hygiene and health, Sofia 23-24.
  2. Born T, Kontoghiorghe CN, Spyrou A, Kolnagou A, Kontoghiorghes GJ (2013) EDTA chelation reappraisal following new clinical trials and regular use in millions of patients: review of preliminary findings and risk/benefit assessment. Toxicol Mech Methods 23:11-17.
  3. Bradberry S, Vale A (2009) A comparison of sodium calcium edetate (edetate calcium disodium) and succimer (DMSA) in the treatment of inorganic lead poisoning. Clin Toxicol 47: 841-858.
  4. Counter SA, Ortega F, Shannon MW, Buchanan LH (2003) Succimer (meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA)) treatment of Andean children with environmental lead exposure. Int J Occup Environ Health 9: 164-168.
  5. Crinnion WJ (2011) EDTA redistribution of lead and cadmium into the soft tissues in a human with a high lead burden - should DMSA always be used to follow EDTA in such cases? Altern Med Rev16: 109-112.
  6. Flora SJ, Flora G, Saxena G, Mishra M (2007) Arsenic and lead induced free radical generation and their reversibility following chelation Cellular and Molecular Biology 53: 26-47.
  7. Graziano JH, Lolacono NJ, Moulton T (1992) Controlled study of meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid for the management of childhood lead intoxication. J. Pediatr 120: 133-139.
  8. Graziano JH, Lolacono NJ, Meyer P (1988) Dose-response study of oral 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid in children with elevated blood lead concentrations. J Pediatr 113: 751-757.
  9. Hoet P, Buchet JP, Decerf L, Lavalleye B, Haufroid V, et al. (2006) Clinical evaluation of a lead mobilization test using the chelating agent dimercaptosuccinic acid. Clin Chem 52: 88-96.
  10. Kianoush S, Balali-Mood M, Mousavi SR, Moradi V, Sadeghi M, et al. (2012) Comparison of therapeutic effects of garlic and d-Penicillamine in patients with chronic occupational lead poisoning. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 110: 476-481.
  11. Lee BK, Ahn KD, Lee SS, Lee GS, Kim YB, et al. (2000) A comparison of different lead biomarkers in their associations with lead-related symptoms. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73: 298-304.
  12. Mihalache C, Oprea V, Constantin B, Pintilie W, Teslariu E, et al. (2004) Chronic lead poisoning like a group pathology. Clinical report of 12 cases.Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 108: 159-164.
  13. Ogawa M, Nakajima Y, Kubota R, Endo Y (2008) Two cases of acute lead poisoning due to occupational exposure to lead. Clin Toxicol 46: 332-335.
  14. Petracca M, Scafa F, Boeri R, Flachi D, Candura SM (2013) Imported occupational lead poisoning: report of four cases. Med Lav 104: 428-433.
  15. Pollock CA, Ibels LS (1988) Lead intoxication in Sydney Harbour Bridge workers. Aust N Z J Med 18: 46-52.
  16. Restek-Samarzija N, Blanusa M, Pizent A, Samarzija M, Turk R, et al. (1988) Meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment of occupationally exposed lead workers. Arh Hig Rada Toksiko 49:137-145.
  17. Roberts DM, Singer RF (2012) Lead mobilization study and the clearance of intravenous CaNa2EDTA in a patient with end-stage renal failure on hemodialysis. J Clin Pharmacol 52:110-113.
  18. Thomas DL, Chisolm J (1986) Lead, zinc and copper decorporation during calcium disodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate treatment of lead-poisoned children. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 239: 829-835.
  19. Torres-Alanis O, Garza-Ocanas L, Pineyro-Lopez A (2002) Effect of meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid on urinary lead excretion in exposed men. Hum Exp Toxicol 21: 573-577.
Citation: Georgieva VG, Boyadzhieva V, Kuneva T and Pavlova S (2015) Antidotal Effect of Succimer and CaNa2 EDTA on Workers Exposed to Lead, Cadmium and Arsenic. J Clin Toxicol 5:238.

Copyright: © 2015 Georgieva VG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top