Journal of Ergonomics

Journal of Ergonomics
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-7556

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2015) Volume 0, Issue 0

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Sequential Transverse and Lateral Markings on Perceived Speed on a Single-lane Straight Road

Yotsutsuji H1*, Kitamura K2 and Kita H2
1Organization of Advanced Science and Technology, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
2Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
*Corresponding Author: Yotsutsuji H, Organization of Advanced Science and Technology, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan, Tel: +81-78-803-6079, Fax: +81-78-803-6013 Email:

Abstract

We focus on the vehicle speed inducement effect of sequence patterns of transverse and lateral markings on a single-lane straight road. We test the effectiveness of several sequence patterns through experiments with a driving simulator. The sequence patterns are characterized by patterns of progressively and concurrently reduced spacing of transverse lines on the road surface and lateral poles on the roadside. We examine the discrepancy between vehicle speed and speed perceived by the drivers under the influence of several sequence patterns, estimating driver-perceived speed using a hidden Markov model. Experiments show that (1) perceived speed tends to be higher than actual vehicle speed, except for patterns where lines and poles were equally spaced in all intervals or where spacing was greatly decreased in the middle intervals, and (2) in the case of a pattern where spacing was greatly decreased in the first intervals, vehicle speed rapidly decreased while the perceived speed remained high.

Keywords: Road markings; Speed inducement; Sequence effect; Perceived speed; Discrepancy between objectivity and subjectivity; Hidden Markov model; Driving simulation experiment

Introduction

Traffic administrators in Japan are devising a variety of road marking patterns designed to reduce vehicle speeds for improved traffic safety. One such pattern consists of transverse lines with progressively reduced spacing to give drivers the impression that their speed is increasing. The road markings verified as inducing a deceleration effect on multi-lane straight roads include “optical dot” roadsurface markings at the Bijogi Junction Saitama-Omiya Line of the Metropolitan Expressway Company [1] and “sequence design” tunnel wall markings in the Inariyama tunnel on the Hanshin Expressway Company’s Kyoto Line [2]. However, we do not well understand how the patterns of progressively reduced spacing in these cases actually induce drivers to decelerate.

We focus on the mechanism by which patterns of sequential transverse and lateral markings induce drivers to decelerate, and test the effectiveness of various markings on a single-lane straight road through in-house experiments with a driving simulator. We define a “sequence pattern” as the alignment of progressively and concurrently reduced spacing of transverse lines on the road surface and lateral poles on the road side, “transverse and lateral markings” as road markings with a sequence patterns, and a “sequence effect” as a vehicle speed inducement effect produced by sequence patterns.

Denton [3-5] provides pioneering research regarding speed inducement mechanisms of road markings with sequence patterns. Conducting an in-house experiment with a driving simulator called a “dynamic visual field generator,” Denton tested the hypothesis that when driving a vehicle over road markings with a pattern of progressively reduced spacing after having adapted to a constant speed on a singlelane straight road, drivers decelerate due to an illusion of acceleration. His research was continued by a number of successors, whose findings included the following: (1) Road markings with sequence patterns may lessen the distribution variance of the platoon speed of several vehicles [6]. (2) Sequence effects may differ over the short and long term [7]. (3) Peak periods of vehicle deceleration may shift with different sequence patterns [8]. (4) The trigger point to remind drivers to slow down may vary with road section length [9]. (5) Shapes such as chevrons, herringbone, and transverse bars may influence sequence effects [10-14]. (6) Tunnel wall markings, sound insulation wall markings, and other lateral markings may have different sequence effects from those of road surface markings [15,16].

Regarding speed reduction markings with progressively reduced spacing to give drivers the impression that their speed is increasing, MUTCD [17] indicates that the sequence pattern itself assumes a key role in the vehicle speed inducement effect. However, we do not necessarily understand the mechanism behind how sequence patterns induce deceleration.

We focus on driver speed perceptions to study mechanisms of the vehicle speed inducement effect, under the assumption of their involvement in discrepancies between perceived and actual speed. In a driving scene where transverse and lateral markings are displayed on the road, optic flows [18] generally cause the driver to perceive movement of objects in the scene at a speed relative to the vehicle speed. We hereby define “perceived speed” as this relative speed perceived by the driver.

This study empirically analyzes discrepancies between actual and perceived speed under the influence of transverse and lateral sequence patterns on a single-lane straight road simulated in in-house experiments, while estimating perceived speed using a hidden Markov model (HMM).

Methods

Procedure

We first conduct a driving simulation experiment with a driving simulator (DS) under several types of sequence patterns. In this experiment, vehicle speed transitions are investigated in relation to the sequence patterns.

We then conduct a “perception experiment” to investigate relationships in the change rate between vehicle and perceived speed for a given sequence pattern. In this experiment we prepare two types of recorded moving pictures (MP). The first is a reference MP in which sequence patterns are displayed at a constant speed on the DS screens display. The second is a comparison MP in which the sequence pattern type and MP playback speed differ from the reference MP.

Finally, we use an analytical model to estimate the perceived speed for a given sequence pattern from changes in the vehicle speed. The perception experiment easily analyzes correspondence relationships, but not transitioning. In contrast, the DS experiment easily measures vehicle speed, but not continuous data related to perceived speed. For these reasons, we estimate transitions of perceived speed using a HMM. In this study, the change rate of perceived speed is a discrete latent variable of the HMM and the transition of change rate of vehicle speed observed under each sequence pattern is supervised data of the HMM.

Modeling the markings

We can divide a single-lane straight road with transverse and lateral markings into D sections. Let D be the set of all sections. Transverse lines and lateral poles are located at equally-spaced intervals in each section image.The degree of the equally spaced intervals in an arbitrary section imagedecreases at a rate greater than that in the previous sectiond. Hence, comparing two adjacent sections, the degree of spacing in each section decreases in the direction of vehicle forward movement in D, although there is equal spacing within the limits of each section. This study treats alignment like this as the sequence pattern.

Preparing Q patterns as the sequence pattern, we let Q be a set of all patterns. We define imageas the interval between markings in image,locating lines and poles with an arbitrary sequence pattern image.Then we use image to prepare an indicator defined as imageWe refer to this indicator imageas the “decrease rate” of image

Setting the class

When N drivers respectively drive M times in D, we let and M are the set of all drivers and the set of drive frequencies for each driver, respectively. When driver m∈M drives m times as the m∈M in section d with pattern q, we let imagebe the average vehicle speed for drive m. In the DS experiment, imageis calculated by averaging the series of instantaneous vehicle speeds measured every 0.02 sec within d. We use imageto define imageas the “change rate” of the vehicle speed image. For the sake of expedience, we define the “perceived speed” imageresponding according toimage.We also define imageas a change rate of q that is representative of all drivers in section d with pattern q .

The problem is that imageis difficult to directly measure in the DS experiment. Therefore, transitions of imagere estimated by an HMM based on observed data for transitions of image. A HMM is a Markov chain of each discrete latent variable in combination with some discrete observed variables. However, imageand imageare not discrete, but rather continuous positive and negative rates. We thus propose discretizing to partitions by “class,” as we explain below in detail, to each imageand image.Accordingly, the class of imageis a discrete latent variable, while the class of imageis a discrete observed variable in the HMM. The term “class” means a partition of the change rate of speed over a common range regardless of section, sequence pattern, driver, or drive frequency. We first explain how to partition imageinto several classes:imageis divided into K parts, each with upper limit imageand lower limit image(whereimageandimage+ = ), regardless of d,q,n,m . When imagebelongs to the imageclass, we let this class be image, defined image as

. To partition imageinto classes, the number of the class of imageis K, as for image. When kth belongs to the kth class, we let the class be imageThe upper limit imageand lower limit image of imageare the same as that of image

Transition of the perceived speed

We next explain how to estimate transitions of the perceived speed imagethrough all sections D for a sequence pattern q : Using the HMM we can estimate a course that the optimal imagecan steer through, to maximize occurrence probability of each imagecan be estimated. Accordingly, a transition of q can be estimated for a given sequence pattern q given an initial value of imageand imagev can be analyzed, where

image

We assume the Markov property for transitions of imageUsing conditional probability, this property can be expressed as image.We letimagebe the transition probability from imageto image.Assuming that imagedoes not depend on image,we let imagebe a homogeneous transition probability. Now, suppose imageis obtained in d −1 . When we let imagebe an occurrence probability of image,the optimal imageis calculated by image by the Viterbi algorithm [19] and pIk is calculated via the Baum–Welch algorithm [20]. Regarding estimation of image,we utilize the results of the perception experiment, as explained later in detail. We executed the above calculations using R [21].

Experimental design

DS Experiment: The roadway displayed on the DS screen represents a two-lane bi-directional intercity expressway typical of Japan. Total width of the roadway is 13 m, comprising two 3.5 m lanes, a 1.5 m median strip, two 1.75 m left shoulders, and two 0.5 m right shoulders. In the transverse and lateral markings illustrated in Figure 1, the width of each transverse line in the direction of vehicle movement is 45 cm, and the length perpendicular to the lane is 3.5 m. The height of each lateral pole is 2.5 m.

Ergonomics-moving-pictures

Figure 1: A snapshot of moving pictures in the DS.

Table 1 shows the eight sequence patterns presented to the test subjects. The five sections labeled I–V in Table 1 were preceded by a 600 m run-up section in which the drivers accelerated from speed zero. The length of each section I–V was 100 m, in consideration of habituation effects while driving on the markings. The last 100 m in the run-up section is labeled as section Z in Table 1. We refer to the average speed in section Z as an “initial value” of the speed.

  Section Z I II III IV V
1 Interval [m] 12.00 11.40 10.83 10.29 9.77 9.29
DR [%] 0 5 5 5 5 5
2 Interval [m] 12.00 10.80 9.72 8.75 7.87 7.09
DR [%] 0 10 10 10 10 10
3 Interval [m] 12.00 10.20 8.67 7.37 6.26 5.32
DR [%] 0 15 15 15 15 15
4 Interval [m] 12.00 10.20 9.18 8.72 8.28 7.87
DR [%] 0 15 10 5 5 5
5 Interval [m] 12.00 11.40 10.26 8.72 7.85 7.46
DR [%] 0 5 10 15 10 5
6 Interval [m] 12.00 11.40 10.83 10.29 9.26 7.87
DR [%] 0 5 5 5 10 15
7 Interval [m] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
DR [%] 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Interval [m] 7.00 6.30 5.67 5.10 4.59 4.13
DR [%] 0 10 10 10 10 10

Interval: the interval between markings DR: the decrease rate image

Table 1: The eight sequence patterns.

Each of the eight sequence patterns shown in Table 1 has the following characteristics: Types 1, 2, and 3 have the same respective decrease rates image,imageand imagethrough all sections I–V. Types 4, 5, and 6 have respectively greater decrease rates image,imageand imageand imagein the beginning, middle, and end sections than in the remaining sections. Type 7 has a zero decrease rate because of its equally spaced intervals. Type 8 has a different initial interval value in Z from the other types, although its sequence pattern is the same as that of type 2. Concerning decrease rates from I to V, any of 5%, 10%, or 15% has been applied to the rates, except type 7.

The test subjects were five fourth year students at Kobe University, each of whom had a driver’s license. Figure 2 shows a scene from the experiment. No speedometer is displayed on the DS screen during the experiment, although Figure 2 shows one for convenience. The tests were run three times for each sequence pattern. The experimenter instructed each subject to maintain a constant speed while looking into the far distance along the road in the DS screen.

Ergonomics-scene-experiment

Figure 2: A scene of the DS experiment.

Perception experiment: The experimenter prepared a baseline MP displaying markings at 12 m intervals and displayed at a fixed speed of 70 km/h. The baseline MP was created from a transcription of a driver running at a fixed speed in the type 7 sequence pattern. The experimenter also prepared comparison MPs for contrast with the baseline MP. The experimenter told test subjects the interval and playback speed values of the baseline MP, but not those of the comparison MPs.

We prepared 32 comparison MPs, shown in Table 2. The experimenter showed each subject the baseline MP for 3 s, then each of the 32 cases for 3 s in random order. Subjects immediately chose upper and lower playback speed limits for the comparison MP to estimate speeds in 2 km/h increments in the range 44–100 km/h. This process was repeated nine times, and we took the median value of the upper and lower limits chosen by the subject as the perceived speed of the subject.

Case 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DR [%] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Speed [km/h] 55 60 65 67 69 70 72 75
Case 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
DR [%] 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Speed [km/h] 55 60 65 67 69 70 72 75
Case 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
DR [%] 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Speed [km/h] 55 60 65 67 69 70 72 75
Case 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
DR [%] 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Speed [km/h] 55 60 65 67 69 70 72 75

DR: the decrease rate imageSpeed: the comparison speed as contrasted with the baseline.

Table 2: 32 moving picture comparisons.

Analysis Results

Results of the experiments

Figure 3 shows vehicle speed data obtained in the DS experiment. Since the DS measured instantaneous vehicle speed every 0.02 s, we averaged all spot speeds per number of data within each section. We refer to this as the “average spot speed.” Each subject ran each sequence pattern three times in the DS experiment. We hereinafter refer to an average of the three average spot speeds as a “section speed” of the vehicle. Because each subject tried to drive at a constant speed but without reference to a speedometer, the section speeds are distributed as shown in Figure 3.

Ergonomics-Transitions-vehicle

Figure 3: Transitions of vehicle speed data obtained in the DS experiment.

In Figure 3, in sequence patterns 3, 4, 5 and 6 in which the decrease rate of line and pole spacing was 15% in all intervals, in the first intervals, in the middle intervals and in the last intervals, respectively, each standard deviation of section speed of five subjects has a large value in the section in which the decrease rate was set at 15%. In sequence pattern 7 in which spacing was equal 12m in all intervals, each transition of section speed of five subjects stays relatively steady and each standard deviation of section speed has a small value in all sections.

Figure 4 shows the relationship between subject- perceived speeds and the playback speed of comparison MPs, that is, vehicle speed. Figure 4 displays nine dots for each of the four decrease rates because each subject performed each test nine times. Each dot indicates the average value of five subjects in the eight cases belonging to the same decrease rate in Table 2. Figure 4 shows that the subjects had a propensity to overestimate vehicle speed, regardless of the marking decrease rate.

Ergonomics-vehicle-speed

Figure 4: Perceived speed vs. vehicle speed.

Results of the estimation

Considering the results of a goodness-of-fit test on the data obtained from the DS experiment (Table 4), we used the seven classes shown in Table 3. Values for the change rate of vehicle speed imagewere statistically identical among the decrease rates imagerepresented as 5%, 10%, and 15% in Table 4, so we set the upper and lower limits of each class as shown in Table 3. The *, **, and *** symbols in Table 4 indicate that the null hypothesis is rejected at 10%, 5%, and 1% levels of significance for a two-sided test, respectively. For instance, in the case of class 2, where the P value of a chi-square test was 0.053, the null hypothesis “the value of imageis statistically independent for each imagein the class” was regrettably rejected at the 5% level of significance. In general, however, the null hypotheses are not rejected for most classes at least at a 1% level of significance.

Since we have seven classes, the data series of imagecan be obtained from the results of the DS experiment. We applied the Baum–Welch algorithm to the data series to estimate plk .imageestimated from the results of the perception experiment, we can calculate imageusing the Viterbi algorithm. From the upper limits of imageand the initial value of image,the transition of imagecan be estimated for each sequence pattern.

From the above, as shown in Figure 5 we found the characteristics of discrepancy between actual and perceived speed for each sequence pattern.

Ergonomics-vehicle-speeds

Figure 5: Discrepancy between perceived and actual vehicle speeds.

Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
UL(%) -100 -8 -4 -2 -1 0 3
LL(%) -8 -4 -2 -1 0 3 100

UL: the upper limit imagein class imageLL: the upper limit image

Table 3: Class settings.

Class Number of  for each of the three P value of
 test
5% 10% 15%
1 4 10 7 0.276  
2 32 49 30 0.053 *
3 50 57 34 0.052 *
4 44 55 29 0.018 **
5 53 43 27 0.015 **
6 33 26 16 0.054 *
7 18 12 1 0.001 ***
Total 234 252 144    

Table 4: Goodness-of-fit test for classes.

Discussion

Figure 5 shows the perceived speed for a given sequence pattern and vehicle speed. As that figure shows, the following characteristics were found in the relationship between perceived and actual vehicle speed.

Except for sequence patterns 1 and 5, perceived speeds were significantly higher than actual vehicle speeds. Perceived speeds for sequence patterns 1 and 5, in contrast, were estimated to decrease gradually with vehicle speed. In sequence pattern 7, which has equally spaced intervals, perceived speed was estimated to gradually increase above the vehicle speed, despite the vehicle speed being constant. In sequence patterns 2 and 8, which both had the same imagein sections I–V and different initial imagein section Z, the difference in the initial interval influenced the perceived speed.

Conclusion

Our experiments resulted in five main findings:

• In a sequence pattern in which decrease rate of line and pole spacing was equal 5% in all intervals and one where decrease rate of spacing was greatly increased in the middle intervals, the perceived vehicle speed tended to descend.

• In most sequence patterns other than those above, the perceived vehicle speed was higher than the actual speed.

• In two sequence patterns in which decrease rates of spacing were respectively 10% and 15% in all intervals, trend of the perceived vehicle speeds was different from that in a pattern where decrease rate of spacing was equal 5%.

• In a sequence pattern in which decrease rate of spacing was greatly increased in the first intervals, vehicle speed rapidly decreased while the perceived speed remained high.

• In a sequence pattern in which spacing was equal 12m in all intervals, vehicle speed did not nearly change while the perceived speed was greatly increased.

Several outstanding issues remain. We need to examine vehicle speed behavior at a given perceived speed, the opposite case of the situation examined in this study. We also need to empirically analyze differences in sequence pattern effects that give drivers the impression that their speed is increasing, and the feeling of speed that the DS itself invokes. Finally, we need to study the impact of rapid deceleration of a lead vehicle on following vehicles after the lead vehicle encounters transverse and lateral markings, and whether a resulting accident is a concern.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25420548, and also by a grant from the Express Highway Research Foundation of Japan.

References

  1. Han A, Ono S, Ikeuchi K, Suda Y, Sasaki M (2013) Road marking ‘Optical Dot System’ for controlling the speed: development and Four years empirical analysis. Proceedings of the 20th ITS World Congress, Japan.
  2. Adachi Y, Fujii Y, Tamagawa D, Iwasato Y, Yamada K, Nakamura Y (2010) Experimental study on speed reduction effect by sequence design. Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineering: Division D. 66: 27-39.
  3. Denton GG (1966) A subjective scale of speed when driving a motor vehicle. Ergonomics 9: 203-210.
  4. Denton GG (1976) The influence of adaptation on subjective velocity for an observer in simulated rectilinear motion. Ergonomics 19: 409-430.
  5. Denton GG (1977) Visual motion aftereffect induced by simulated rectilinear motion.  Perception 6: 711-718.
  6. Enustun N (1972) Three experiments with transverse pavement stripes and rumble bars. Report of the Department of Michigan State Highways.
  7. Agent KR (1980) Transverse pavement markings for speed control and accident reduction. Transportation Research Record 773: 11-14.
  8. Zaidel D, Hakkert AS, Barkan R (1986) Rumble strips and paint strips at a rural intersection. Transportation Research Record 1069: 7-13.
  9. Jarvis JR, Jordan P (1990) Yellow bar markings: their design and effect on driver behavior. Proceeding of the 15th Australian Road Research Board Conference, Darwin.
  10. Godley ST, Triggs TJ, Fildes BN (2000) Speed reduction mechanisms of transverse lines. Transportation Human Factors 2: 297-312.
  11. Godley ST, Triggs TJ, F ildes BN (2002) Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accid Anal Prev 34: 589-600.
  12. Charlton SG (2007) The role of attention in horizontal curves: a comparison of advance warning, delineation, and road marking treatments. Accid Anal Prev 39: 873-885.
  13. Katz BJ, Molino JA, Rakha HA (2008) Evaluation of design alternatives of peripheral transverse bars to reduce vehicle speeds and center line enforcement in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board.
  14. Jamson S, Lai F, Jamson H (2010) Driving simulators for robust comparisons: a case study evaluating road safety engineering treatments. Accid Anal Prev 42: 961-971.
  15. Manser MP, Hancock PA (2007) The influence of perceptual speed regulation on speed perception, choice and control: tunnel wall characteristics and influences. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39: 69-78.
  16. Oguchi T, Nigorisawa M, Konuma R, Shikata S (2005) Experimental research on the effects of visual environments on driver’s speed recognition. Annual Meeting and Exhibit Compendium of Technical Papers of the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
  17. The Federal Highway Administration(2009) US Department of Transportation Speed Reduction Markings. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Section 3B.22.
  18. Auvray M1, Spence C (2008) The multisensory perception of flavor. Conscious Cogn 17: 1016-1031.
  19. Viterbi AJ (1967) Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. Information Theory 13: 260-269.
  20. Baum LE (1972) An equality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of Markov processes. Inequalities 3: 1-8.
  21. Zucchini W, MacDonald IL (2009) Hidden Markov models for time series: an introduction using R. CRC Press.
Citation: Yotsutsuji H, Kitamura K, Kita H (2015) An Experimental Study on the Effect of Sequential Transverse and Lateral Markings on Perceived Speed on a Single-lane Straight Road. J Ergonomics S3:010.

Copyright: © 2015 Yotsutsuji H, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top