Peer Review Process
Journal of Surgery: Current research follows a double-blind peer review system. The reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer. There are at least three or more reviewers for the total number of articles in each issue. The magazine is intended for publication by clinical, medical or health professionals, students, professionals and researchers, as well as professional groups and institutions.
Every submitted manuscript managed for preliminary quality control check through editorial office followed by external peer review process. Usually preliminary quality control completes within 7 days and remains majorly with reference to journal formatting, English and journal scope.
The journal process articles through Editorial Tracking for quality publication in the rapid peer review process. Editorial Tracking is an online manuscript submission system that reviews and processes the articles and makes it easy for the author, editor, and reviewers to work simultaneously with easier review strategies and protocols. The review process is executed by the editorial board members of Surgery: Current Research or outside experts; at least two independent reviewer's approval is mandatory followed by editor approval is required for acceptance of any citable manuscript. Authors can have a track on their valuable submissions any time to finally co-operate for processed article submission.